Well, this is a weird one. I’ve never heard of the Fit 2 Fat 2 Fit Experience podcast, hosted by Lynn and Drew Manning, and it seems the last place you’d expect to find fringe history. Drew Manning is the man who intentionally gained 75 pounds in 2012 to document his subsequent fitness regime to lose the weight. The fitness guru’s entire brand revolves around selling fitness regimes and health products. And yet here we are: Scott Wolter appeared on the fitness podcast to discuss fringe history with the hosts because Drew Manning was blown away after meeting Wolter as part of an event in Mexico this month to promote A+E Networks shows in Latin America. “He’s a scientist, and he definitely knows what he’s talking about!” Drew Manning enthused. Lynn Manning added that “these are the facts” and not a conspiracy, “and I find that fascinating.”
The pair said that they became convinced that history could be manipulated by powerful elites because “scientists” once claimed that fat was bad, but now say dietary fat is good. They argue that because scientists can’t get nutrition correct, history, too, must be part of a story told for profit because “corporations” “lie about things.” They will return to this idea later in defending their belief in Scott Wolter and his Jesus conspiracies.
The hosts don’t seem to know that Wolter’s H2 shows have been canceled, or that the H2 network no longer exists (at one point asking when the next season of America Unearthed will debut on H2), but both hosts hail Wolter, 57, as “the modern-day Indiana Jones,” who provided them with “mind-blowing” revelations about history. To avoid confusion, I will refer to Drew and Lynn Manning by their first names, though it goes against my usual style. Drew starts by asking Wolter “did aliens help build the pyramids?” Wolter replies that “my honest answer is that I don’t know, but I highly doubt it.” He says that it’s a mistake to underestimate the intelligence of ancient cultures—except, of course, when this involves the need for Europeans to deliver secret knowledge. Wolter claims that ancient people were more sophisticated than we are today, and he quotes Santayana’s dictum about repeating history to warn that the modern world is going to hell. Lynn asks him to explain this, and Wolter replies by announcing that he is going to have a summit with Graham Hancock in November in order to combine their research in order to discover a lost high civilization of the Ice Age. According to Wolter, the melting glaciers washed away all of the evidence of this lost civilization. Wolter gushes about Hancock’s “compelling geological evidence” for a comet destroying this civilization, and he says—without evidence—that the lost civilization lived in perfect “balance” with nature. Wolter then pivots to the Knights Templar and alleges that there is conclusive evidence that the Knights Templar came to America in 1400 and brought a treasure with them that the Founding Fathers used to fund the Revolutionary War. Even though financial records from the Revolution provide no indication of a huge cash infusion—the Continental Congress used loans, I.O.U.s, and inflated paper currency to pay for the war—Wolter alleges that historians have been “brainwashed” into being unable to see the truth. “There are larger forces at work,” he said, “who have a vested interest in one version of history when in fact the truth is something else.” He claims that the Catholic Church is that vested interest, even though Anti-Catholic prejudice was a major feature of American life down to the 1960s and you’d think that Anti-Catholics would want to expose the Catholic Church’s suppression efforts. Apparently, the Jesuit secret agents were just that good. Wolter then alleges that everything written about him on the internet (cough, ahem, cough – me) is “crap.” (“It’s all crap!”) He adds that “there are people actually being paid to continue to try to undermine people like me that are telling a different story than they want people to believe.” Wolter says that this mysterious “they” (i.e., me) cannot refute his “evidence” (since it does not exist) and therefore attack Wolter personally and viciously to discredit him “to try to undermine [his] credibility.” It goes without saying that I am not paid by anyone to critique historical claims, much to my disappointment. The hosts were somewhat baffled by Wolter’s rant, and the two of them together seem to know less than a modern high school student about history. They are unaware that no scholar believes Christopher Columbus was the first European to reach America (that was the Vikings), so they seem giddy with excitement at the idea that other Europeans came first. Wolter recites his fractured fairy tale about how the Catholics used Columbus (whom Wolter once identified as a Templar!) to deprive the Natives of their land in order to crush the Templars, who were also the Native Americans. It doesn’t make sense, but who can keep all of the conspiracies straight? Wolter returns again to the idea that “online” critics (clearly, this must include me) are “creeping around” and criticizing him surreptitiously. “Anyone can be a tough guy sitting behind a computer,” Wolter said in response to a question about whether he ever felt his life was in danger. He implied that he would like critics to (verbally) attack him in person so that he could have a face-to-face confrontation. He later alleges that his critics have “stalked” him online. Wolter claims that Mayan and Babylonian astrological systems are “scientific” and that because of the December 2012 “paradigm shift that occurred,” “the reign of the Fisher King would end.” Wolter, as you know, began hosting America Unearthed in December 2012. He identifies the Fisher King as Jesus based on Ralph Ellis’s fringe claims, but the medieval European Grail character is not typically identified as Jesus. In the real world, the Fisher King was a character invented by Chretien de Troyes for the poem Percival, and may draw on Celtic myths about Bran the Blessed. This isn’t important, though, because Wolter announces that he believes that Jesus was merely a “good person,” but that the true semi-divine figure was Mary Magdalene, who should be venerated in his stead. Wolter adds that he is in the process of writing a new book, but “something big” came up and requires him to rewrite the book to incorporate it. He repeats after that some of his recent claims about the so-called Jesus Ossuary containing the “Hooked X®” and a “tau cross.” He wrongly asserts that the Hooked X® is the same as the Hebrew letter aleph, and he claims that the “last letter” of the Hebrew alphabet is a “tau cross” and derived from the Egyptian ankh. The Paleo-Hebrew version of that letter, the tav, is cross-shaped and is related to the Phoenician letter that became the Greek tau. Wolter says that a Hooked X® and a tau therefore are the alpha and the omega, Jesus. He adds that the Knights Templar entered the Talpiot Tomb during the First Crusade and discovered all of this, because the Knights Templar were the genetic descendants of Jesus and received Christ’s secrets through “family” history. Hundreds or thousands of knights drawn from a geographically diverse area… Which of them were Christ’s hundred-times-great grandkids? All of them? Just the elite? If they were already elite, why did they need the Knights to share conspiracies they already knew? “My life is an ongoing Dan Brown movie right now,” Wolter said. “The basic premise of the Bloodline is 100% true.” Drew and Leslie repeat that they find Wolter’s claims to be convincing because they believe that Wolter is a scientist whose inferences and assertions are actually facts. Leslie believes that corporations and religions are hiding facts from us for profit, and therefore they believe that claims that oppose the interest of corporations must be true. Leslie and Drew believe that “scientists” lie all the time for money, and they claim that their experiences with bad nutrition claims and bad medical advice regarding dietary fat prove that science is intentionally teaching the public false information. They liken the suppression of fringe history to the inflation of cost for the Epi-Pen, even though “scientists” don’t set the price for the EpiPen, and other companies are free to make competing products. (Europe has competing brands.) This is an excellent illustration of how science is failing the public. Non-specialists have difficulty understanding the provisional nature of science and, for that matter, the difference between facts, inferences, and assertions. Note, too, that Drew and Leslie believe that when Wolter waves a microscope at a rock, he is revealing truth, but when credentialed scientists and historians offer evaluations of history they must be lying. In other words, their own sense of trust in an individual (Wolter) over an anonymous institution (“science” or “corporations”) leads them to believe ideas based on less evidence because it is personal, emotional, and keeping with their preexisting ideology and personal experiences. Wolter chimes in that he believes that unnamed forces, perhaps drug companies, are suppressing a cure for diabetes in order to make money off of insulin sales. “It makes me crazy,” Wolter said, alleging that people in his family continue to suffer from diabetes because of a conspiracy. He adds that he thinks that cancer has also been cured as well, but that corporations are hiding the truth in order to make money. Drew and Leslie agree that the either the government or corporations are hiding health cures. Wolter returns again near the end to criticizing “a lot of people online” (sigh, yes, me again) for allegedly calling him a liar and a pseudoscientist, saying that critics should not doubt his conclusions about runic inscriptions because “the government” (that arch-conspirator!) considered him competent to analyze the structural integrity of concrete from the Pentagon after 9/11. The two things have nothing to do with one another, as no one questions the structural integrity of a forged runic inscription, nor did anyone ask Wolter to date the construction of the Pentagon. They are two very different skills. It is probably worth noting again that Wolter uses relative dating, not absolute dating, and in most cases even his own windows for when an artifact was created, taken at face value, cannot exclude hoaxing. His windows for the Kensington Rune Stone and the Bat Creek Stone, for example, both could not exclude modern dates. The show finishes with Wolter describing the episode of America Unearthed in which he wentin search of Bigfoot. He claims that he had to insist to the network that he be allowed to doubt Bigfoot’s existence on air. In the last minutes, Wolter claims that his favorite book ever is by Alan Butler, and says that he is planning a new TV series and is in talks with networks about it. The hosts tried a couple of more times to get Wolter to admit that aliens were involved in ancient history, but to his credit he didn’t take the bait.
42 Comments
Time Machine
10/28/2016 11:03:12 am
>>> Founding Fathers<<<
Reply
Gunn
10/28/2016 12:23:06 pm
From above: "It is probably worth noting again that Wolter uses relative dating, not absolute dating, and in most cases even his own windows for when an artifact was created, taken at face value, cannot exclude hoaxing. His windows for the Kensington Rune Stone and the Bat Creek Stone, for example, both could not exclude modern dates."
Reply
Tom
10/28/2016 12:53:05 pm
As it appears likely that Mr Wolper is an avid reader of this blog it is probably wearisome to him to point out that the "Jesus Bloodline" by now would number in the hundreds of millions.
Reply
Time Machine
10/28/2016 03:18:58 pm
>>> "Jesus Bloodline" by now would number in the hundreds of millions<<<
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
10/29/2016 12:11:01 am
That claim would be more credible if the details of Jesus' life given in the gospels didn't conflict with Old Testament prophecy at many points. The early Christians had to twist facts, or choose contorted interpretations of the relevant prophecies, in order to make Jesus' life fit with their beliefs. The prime example is that the messiah was supposed to be from Bethlehem, based on a passage in the book of Micah, but as everybody knew, Jesus was from Nazareth, far from Bethlehem and with no religious significance. Thus, the idea arose at some point that he was born in Bethlehem. To explain why Jesus was born in Bethlehem but raised in Nazareth, the authors of the gospels of Matthew and Luke fabricated two different, contradictory stories about his birth.
Time Machine
10/29/2016 02:37:39 am
All wrong - because every single book and Biblical scholar on Jesus Christ are wrong - and have been wrong from the very beginning.
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
10/29/2016 01:46:46 pm
1. The remains of Nazareth have not been extensively excavated, which gave room for René Salm to claim that it didn't exist in Jesus' time. However, even though the site hasn't been fully explored, coinage has been found there that goes back as far as Hellenistic times, and a farm was recently excavated that dates to Jesus' time. Nazareth existed. Plus, if it didn't and "Nazareth" means something else, why do the gospels explicitly say that Jesus was from Galilee, the region of Judea where Nazareth is?
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
10/29/2016 02:09:45 pm
3. And you still haven't addressed the passages by Paul that refer to him as the fleshly descendant of King David who was born of a woman, was executed, and was buried.
Time Machine
10/29/2016 02:48:05 pm
1. Nazareth is not mentioned anywhere in the Old Testament and was never mentioned by Josephus.
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
10/29/2016 04:34:06 pm
"Paul's references to Jesus that you refer to may not be to past history, but to speculative symbolic definition of the Messiah."
Time Machine
10/29/2016 04:42:33 pm
The Line of David was pure romance. It was dissolved by the Babylonian occupation of Judaea. It was not restored when the Jews returned to Palestine --- and Israel existed without Kingship until the Maccabees.
Time Machine
10/29/2016 04:56:36 pm
"But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship."
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
10/29/2016 05:05:45 pm
"The Line of David was pure romance. It was dissolved by the Babylonian occupation of Judaea."
Time Machine
10/29/2016 06:52:16 pm
All wrong. The history of the Maccabees is reality. The history of the Gospels is fantasy. There were no Gospels in first century Christianity, that's why Christianity crashed.
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
10/29/2016 10:21:53 pm
You're still not addressing why, if the story of Jesus' life as we know it was fabricated in the second century, the fabricators chose to set it in a period of no particular significance (the late 20s and early 30s), involving historical figures of no great significance, and how they managed to portray that period with such accuracy. You're still not addressing how the new tradition managed to so thoroughly erase the original one that Irenaeus wasn't aware that the original one ever existed. And you're treating the canonical gospels as a single tradition, when even the synoptic gospels have somewhat differing agendas and John reflects a dramatically different view of Jesus and set of events in his life. If their views of Jesus were so different (and the non-canonical gospels were still more so), why did they all agree that Jesus walked and talked around Judea in the days of Pilate? Why agree on that, of all things, when they disagreed so radically on most other things about Jesus? Why did the Gnostics say Jesus was a spirit and not a human but STILL believe that he walked and talked around Judea?
Time Machine
10/30/2016 07:18:25 am
There are no references to a Humanoid Jesus Christ dating from the first century. Also, diagnosis of Gospel material is required. This was done in Germany during the 19th century where every passage in the Gospels was built on Old Testament passages. Bibles are produced that show which Old Testament passage was an equivalent of a New Testament passage. I own such a Bible,
Time Machine
10/30/2016 07:29:17 am
The crucifixion depicted within the writings of Paul is an atoning sacrifice, Paul never places it within a historical context naming Pontius Pilate. The crucifixion within the writings of Paul is a metaphysical religious formula. Not a historical event,
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
10/30/2016 12:54:04 pm
So your hypothesis only works if:
Time Machine
10/30/2016 04:13:37 pm
It's good to know that the forger of Tacitus committed the gaff of calling Pontius Pilate a "procurator".
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
10/30/2016 06:32:00 pm
"It's good to know that the forger of Tacitus committed the gaff of calling Pontius Pilate a 'procurator'."
Time Machine
10/30/2016 09:43:57 pm
You keep repeating the stuff found in books and the Biblical scholars who write those books don't know anything about the subject matter and they never have done.
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
11/4/2016 01:59:39 am
Yeah, we know you're the smartest person ever and know more than entire communities of people who spend their lives studying the subject matter. Whether it's Freemasonry or Jesus or the origin of religion, only you know the truth.
Shane Sullivan
10/28/2016 12:58:02 pm
"He claims that he had to insist to the network that he be allowed to doubt Bigfoot’s existence on air."
Reply
Kal
10/28/2016 02:04:11 pm
I cannot begin to unravel the latest hooey from our buddies SW and JH. Ha. I'm sure JC is not the only one who discredits SW bunkery at every turn. I've seen other critics. I also know the KRS is a fake, but they will refuse to believe that, even when told by the family that left it, yeah, it's a fake. They will claim, no they were told to tell me it was a fake. Also if he's basic Templars on fictional bloodline books, that's oddly hilarious. The templars were all killed in France by that king. None of them survived. But no, it's a conspiracy and somehow they escaped. Pyramids tough aren't built by aliens. At this point SW is a troll. Ignore him.
Reply
V
10/29/2016 09:58:59 pm
Um...only the French Templars were killed by Phillip. Any number of Templars in other nations survived. But the Order of the Knights Templar was dissolved, so they just weren't Templars anymore. Many of them were allowed to roll into other orders of knights or joined up again afterwards.
Reply
Eric Plumrose
10/28/2016 02:55:08 pm
'He adds that he thinks that cancer has also been cured as well.'
Reply
10/28/2016 03:55:12 pm
The exchange was a little confused. He seemed to say that he thinks that an unnamed "they" know "more" about cancer than "they" let on, which I take to mean that he thinks that there are cures that haven't been revealed. He treats "cancer" as a singular phenomenon, so presumably he is referring to all the kinds.
Reply
TheBigMike
10/28/2016 04:40:02 pm
Hey Jason, I just noticed this:
Reply
10/28/2016 05:14:31 pm
Thanks. I've fixed it. Some day I will manage to type correctly, but I fear that day is not yet here.
Reply
Only Me
10/28/2016 06:11:46 pm
Same old hogwash from one Scott Wolter. The only new thing offered was his announcement to collaborate with Graham Hancock. If all evidence of this lost civilization was washed away, then neither he nor Hancock have any "research" to combine. I'd like to see how they're going to discover this civilization, for which no traces exist.
Reply
Americanegro
10/28/2016 07:10:02 pm
When you've said "Wolter" it's redundant to say "pivots to the Knights Templar" don'tcha think?
Reply
Americanegro
10/28/2016 07:41:35 pm
Wolter's latest thing is that the Kensington Runestone is a coded version of some razzamatazz from York Rite Freemasonry that he says he recently got initiated into and now he's all about "Brother Masons" and how 22 divided by 8 equals 2.75 FEET. That's the new development he mentioned. Because the people who built the pyramids and the Ark of the Covenant measured things in feet, right? Is there a medical term for "aggressively retarded"?
Reply
Joe Scales
10/29/2016 12:02:45 am
Note Wolter is now only focusing on the numbers 8 and 22, as they're the only coincidental two number sequence that you can find in both the KRS and the York Rite Ritual. His earlier blog post claiming that an entire string of numbers coincided on both the KRS and York Rite Ritual text was easily disproved by a simple reading of the latter. What a fool he must have been to have actually gone before his Freemason brethren with such malarkey easily exposed as false and misleading by those who had likely been most familiar with it.
Time Machine
10/29/2016 02:45:51 am
>> 8 and 22<<
Time Machine
10/28/2016 07:48:34 pm
>>dietary fat is good
Reply
Clint Knapp
10/28/2016 08:02:30 pm
"He implied that he would like critics to (verbally) attack him in person so that he could have a face-to-face confrontation."
Reply
Kal
10/28/2016 08:41:47 pm
During the down times in Minnesota there are a lot of bars for bar hopping, and a lot of bs stories happen in bars, and that is probably where SW got his whole schtick.
Reply
Joe Scales
10/28/2016 10:57:32 pm
I suppose Wolter fantasizes in regard to physically assaulting those that expose his fraudulent fringe activities and general mendacity online. I don't believe anyone is claiming to be "tough" in this regard; just more intelligent. But should Wolter ever get his wish, perhaps he should keep in mind that there's always a bigger fish.
Reply
mike jones
10/29/2016 06:50:04 am
So "scientists" are liars and manipulators but they believe Wolter because he's a "scientist"?
Reply
10/29/2016 04:47:19 pm
Exactly.
Reply
Campblor
10/29/2016 05:55:55 pm
America unearthed has just recently been added to Netflix here in Australia....personally i think its great! Its a laugh a minute, though i do get a headache by the end of an episode. Not sure if its from laughing or trying to process the leaps of logic
Reply
GMS1976
10/30/2016 03:42:35 pm
I find myself amused. Wolter's theories are clearly conjecture, and he does his level best to bend history around his beliefs, and when questioned, or evidence is requested to provided a sound historical basis to his theories, he has a little tantrum like a two-year-old because he's feeling "attacked" and picked on. It's like watching a stuck record go round and round.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
October 2024
|