This past week, conservatives across the country rose up to take on the most pressing issue of the day, the New York Times’ ongoing series reporting on the continuing legacy of slavery on modern American life to mark the 400th anniversary of slavery in the lands that eventually became the United States. Conservative leaders claimed that the paper was doing a disservice to America by sowing division through a discussion of historical facts and making America look bad by explaining the compromises and corruptions that slavery created at the heart of the American social, economic, and political systems. In the Atlantic, Ibram X. Kendi of American University wrote in support of the Times’ project, but in doing so, he offered his own ahistorical claim. In his piece, Kendi claimed that “Some Africans probably came before Christopher Columbus” and included a link to Ivan Van Sertima’s discredited Afrocentrist book They Came Before Columbus, which is full of fake history, misreported facts, and intentional fabrications. It’s a minor point in Kendi’s article, but it is a disappointment to see a scholar who heads up the Antiracist Research and Policy Center endorse fake history in support of the actual history of African-descended people in the Americas.
Meanwhile, NBC News reports that the Epoch Times has become one of the most prominent outlets spreading pro-Trump propaganda among the Chinese diaspora and beyond. According to NBC, the paper’s parent company, a nonprofit called Epoch Media, has spent $1.5 million on pro-Trump advertising as part of a push to gain Trump’s support against China’s communist government. The Epoch Times has long used conspiracy theories and sensational stories about ancient mysteries as clickbait to bring in readers and exposed them to the paper’s conservative and right-leaning opinions. In recent years, the Epoch Times has tied itself closely to Trump, featuring articles written by Trump campaign staffers and receiving social media praise and links from Trump and his family. Regular readers will remember the Epoch Times, which has ties to Falun Gong, because that paper ran hundreds of fringe history and pseudoarchaeology stories from writers that included the staff of Ancient Origins and used pieces on aliens and lost civilizations as bait to lure readers to their political and social commentary. Some of the paper’s lowlights have included articles on alleged 150,000-year-old pipes in China, claims that the ancient Mexican calendar originated in China, claims for ancient Chinese UFOs, and praise for America Unearthed. The paper continues to publish conspiracy theories on a wide range of anti-science issues, including anti-vaccine claims and QAnon conspiracies. It’s the same method we see the Russians using with Sputnik and RT, utilizing UFOs and ancient mysteries to lure readers to harder conspiracy theories that pull farther to the extremes.
38 Comments
Joe Scales
8/21/2019 09:46:04 am
"The Epoch Times has long used conspiracy theories and sensational stories about ancient mysteries as clickbait to bring in readers and exposed them to the paper’s conservative and right-leaning opinions. "
Reply
An Anonymous Nerd
8/21/2019 10:43:38 am
A far closer parallel would be Fox News -- the fact that you agree with them, and the conspiracy fantasies they peddle, does not change that.
Reply
Joe Scales
8/21/2019 11:15:46 am
Pretentious imbeciles such as yourself confuse the actual news from FOX with their crazed news-entertainers who come on at night. If you watch their straight up news shows, you'll see they not only cover the stories the other networks show, but the other side as well; which the other networks don't show. Though Shep Smith might editorialize a bit, he's the exception rather than the rule among their newsmen/women. Watch Neil Cavuto some time and tell me he isn't more fair and balanced than anyone you'll see on NBC, CBS or ABC. But no. You won't. You're an imbecile. A partisan. And sort of a cyber-stalker... so please don't take this as an invitation for further discourse. You've never once either understood a point I've made or accurately portrayed it within your wasted bandwidth.
An Anonymous Nerd
8/21/2019 11:26:43 am
Calm down, Mr. Scales.
Machala
8/21/2019 12:20:52 pm
Mr.Scales,
Kent
8/21/2019 03:21:25 pm
Why should I be tasked with watching Fox and MSNBC? Can't I continue NOT watching both? People who say "watch both" inevitably want you to watch THEIR team. Like Bartleby, I prefer not to.
Joe Scales
8/21/2019 09:20:15 pm
"Like many others of your political persuasion, when unable to put forth a cogent or intelligent argument, you resort to name calling and belittling anyone who disagrees with you."
Kent
8/24/2019 09:13:11 pm
Uh, no, Machala, the local Fox affiliates are not "controlled by corporate" in terms of news programming. Remember Fox brought us the Simpsons, Married With Children, Get a LIfe, and Parker Lewis Can't Lose.
Pacal
8/26/2019 02:27:57 pm
"If you watch their straight up news shows, you'll see they not only cover the stories the other networks show, but the other side as well; which the other networks don't show. Though Shep Smith might editorialize a bit, he's the exception rather than the rule among their newsmen/women. Watch Neil Cavuto some time and tell me he isn't more fair and balanced than anyone you'll see on NBC, CBS or ABC. But no. You won't. You're an imbecile. A partisan."
Joe Scales
8/27/2019 10:04:54 am
"Fox News is so biased it is amazing."
Kent
8/27/2019 10:55:36 am
Lists each post on his C.V. under "Publications".
Pacal
9/6/2019 12:58:59 pm
"Just that their straight up news reporting covers more angles and in my view is "more" fair and balanced in comparison to other corporate news entities."
Joe Scales
9/7/2019 09:11:28 am
Uncontrollable laughter is probably par for the course in your regard.
Kent
8/21/2019 10:11:38 am
I wasn't even aware that Epoch Times published in Chinese; I'm a World Journal reader. But it troubles me no end that someone somewhere might be reading something I don't like.
Reply
An Anonymous Nerd
8/21/2019 10:52:30 am
[It’s a minor point in Kendi’s article]
Reply
Kendi
8/21/2019 12:27:36 pm
The "X." in his name is kind of a clue. I've seen him on C-SPAN and he's the sort of New Jack Black Man Joe "crease in his pants, clean and articulate" Biden would like.
Reply
Rainbow unicorn
8/21/2019 03:18:14 pm
My reading of it is that Kendi doesn’t actually believe it, but that he included the reference for two related reasons:
Reply
Kent
8/21/2019 04:40:48 pm
1. It's racist to think that Indians hadn't already invented slavery without the example of whites and blacks
Rainbow Unicorn
8/21/2019 11:34:34 pm
Kent, thank you for your thoughtful response. I especially appreciate that you preserved my numbering system which made relating your points back to my original post much easier.
An Anonymous Nerd
8/22/2019 03:58:32 pm
Responding to two posters here.
Rainbow unicorn
8/22/2019 06:08:15 pm
I acknowledge that the idea behind my original post was a bit far-fetched. Kendi’s statement about Africans sailing to the Americas before Columbus was one example given of the uncertainty of when exactly Africans arrived and that the 400 year anniversary being observed now is somewhat arbitrary. The greater point I took from it is that the history of America has been written from an almost exclusively European viewpoint to the extent that African arrival has been considered largely unworthy of study and has possibly resulted in some weird theories being put forward.
Kent
8/23/2019 06:22:59 am
"[ It's racist to think that Indians hadn't already invented slavery without the example of whites and blacks]
Jim
8/23/2019 12:02:50 pm
Right, because of your penchant to take a small insignificant point of any conversation and make a big deal out of nothing.
Kent
8/23/2019 01:12:22 pm
Or... you're butthurt because you're wrong so often. Never heard about the invasion of Panama, never heard about the invasion of Grenada, never heard about the invasion of Panama, never heard about the invasion of Meixco, never heard about the invasion of the Falklands ... Sarah Palin reads more newspapers.
An Anonymous Nerd
8/23/2019 08:47:13 pm
[["the 400th anniversary of slavery in the lands that eventually became the United States"]]
Kent
8/25/2019 04:58:47 pm
"And you’re right Anon, I don’t think I was giving Kendi a pass and assigning “low expectations.” If anything, I was giving him too much credit in reading into his work a subtle and subversive use of irony."
Jim
8/21/2019 12:26:44 pm
The whole Epoch Times/ Falun Gong story is just bizarre.
Reply
Hasenpfeffer
8/21/2019 07:38:04 pm
"the soft bigotry of low expectations"
Reply
Kent
8/21/2019 08:06:14 pm
You know it's a GWB quote which was crafted by Michael Gerson. If you don't you are disqualified.
Reply
HASENPFEFFER
8/21/2019 10:22:17 pm
I am totally disqualified. I had no idea.
Kent
8/21/2019 11:11:24 pm
I steal from the best. We part as friends!
HASENPFEFFER
8/25/2019 02:24:11 am
What's your favorite song?
Kent
8/22/2019 08:40:33 am
I see no one's mentioned it in the comments but it's been fixed: let me say I liked the earlier version "sewing division through a discussion of historical facts". Not the standard but it's an image that works for me.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
8/22/2019 12:17:43 pm
And how about those deficits and the debt?
Reply
Jr. Time Lord
8/22/2019 09:39:14 pm
Mr. Colavito,
Reply
Kent
8/24/2019 09:18:30 pm
Again with the unnamed "Professors"... just the other day it was the unnamed "6th grade teacher". Argument by authority reduced to absurdity.
Reply
Graham
8/22/2019 10:46:05 pm
Regarding Ibram X. Kendi's comments, he probably learned that because in the 1990s Skeptics failed to prevent the 'Portland African-American Baseline Essays' from being taught in a large number of schools
Reply
Just Sayin'
8/25/2019 07:16:59 am
The 1619 black slaves were stolen by the British from a Portuguese ship bound for the Caribbean. The Spanish already had black slaves in what was to become Florida, Georgia and South Carolina. The first black slaves in the New World were Spanish slaves in Puerto Rico starting in 1513. Slavery in Puerto Rico started to end in 1873 when slaves could buy their freedom, narrowly beating Bolivia's date of 1888.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|