This is one of those stories I didn’t think I’d ever need to write about. Seventeen years ago, the CIA declassified a silly transcript of a “psychic” probe of ancient Martian civilization, and no one paid it much mind until an online version was included in the CIA’s recent release of declassified material in its new Reading Room. I threw a copy up in my Library months ago because I thought it was amusing, but I didn’t bother to highlight it in my blog. However, thanks to the Mysterious Universe podcast, it attracted the attention of Slate magazine, and Slate decided to ask whether America really made contact with ancient Martians from a million years ago. According to the CIA document, in May of 1984, a CIA agent asked a remote viewer to give a reading based on a location sealed in an envelope. That location was Mars c. 1 million BCE. The remote viewer’s name isn’t in the file, but Joe McMoneagle later claimed credit for the adventure in a 1993 book. A 2001 book claimed that the agent who questioned him was F. Holmes “Skip” Atwater, but McMoneagle says that it was a man named Robert Monroe.
The subject, McMoneagle, claimed to see large pyramids and a landscape decimated by a geological disaster. This landscape was populated by giants: “I just keep seeing very large people. They appear thin and tall, but they're very large. Ah...wearing some kind of strange clothes.” These people faced ruin from volcanoes, so they climbed into a flying saucer: “It looks like the inside of a larger boat. Very rounded walls and shiny metal.” McMoneagle claimed to see hibernation chambers and believed that the Martian race was going extinct due to environmental change. Jacob Brogan of the “Future Tense” blog, a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University, became intrigued by the document and sought out the allegedly psychic remote viewer behind the project. McMoneagle is now an old man with a long track record of failed psychic predictions (such as his claim that in the early 2000s people would stop wearing clothing and turn to temporary body tattoos), but he claims to remember every detail of the 1984 session. He assured Brogan that neither he nor Monroe knew the contents of the envelope prior to the session, and both assumed he was targeting a location on Earth until the big reveal. Even though McMoneagle professes to be fascinated by ancient Martian life and to want to visit Mars, he bizarrely chose never to use his “gift” to explore Mars again, saying he didn’t “like” targeting other worlds because there is no way to “verify” the information. So that means he doesn’t trust his own psychic perceptions? The story McMoneagle told does not entirely add up. Despite claiming to have had no knowledge of any of the details for the test, for example, he claims to know that the Army specifically requested this particular test, though he declined to speculate about why they would ask the CIA to perform it. If taken at face value, this suggests that at least some information was leaking to McMoneagle and this was not a truly double-blind experiment. Brogan did not interview any skeptics for his story, and failed to note the striking similarities between Brogan’s vision of a Mars populated by a tall, dying race in pyramids and pop culture images of Mars from the middle twentieth century. The “Face on Mars” had recently been a big deal, and claims for vast pyramid fields on Mars were well-known among fringe types. Richard Hoagland hadn’t yet published his Monuments of Mars (1987), but discussions of the Viking images were nevertheless already popular among UFO types. David L. Chandler, for example, wrote about the “pyramids” of Mars in 1979’s Life on Mars, and in 1975, the pyramids of Mars were even mentioned in Congressional hearings on the space program, though with the caveat that “It does not follow that there are Martian Pharaohs.” (Doctor Who disagreed in the classic story “The Pyramids of Mars” in 1975.) Martin Marietta Aerospace’s 1975 book on the Viking Mars mission, published in their role as the official contractor for the mission, specifically referenced Percival Lowell’s Victorian claims of an ancient and dying Martian race and their vast constructions. From Lowell’s inspiration, science fiction writers from Edgar Rice Burroughs to Aleksey Tolstoy to Robert Heinlein wrote of dying Martian races and their fabulous civilization. Consider Burroughs: “The last poor, mean structures of a dying race have either disappeared or are only mouldering ruins now; but the splendid structures of her prime remain at the edge of the plateau, mute but eloquent reminders of her vanished grandeur.” It is hardly shocking that when McMoneagle tried to describe Mars, he reached for the popular view of the era, at least among sci-fi geeks and paranormalists. The question, then, is how McMoneagle either learned or deduced that the place in question during this session was Mars and not the Earth. Since the recordings of the session have never been released, we can’t know what kind of nonverbal communication occurred, nor whether there were any opportunities for McMoneagle to have overheard or read the target prior to the session. Brogan’s own article suggested that the sessions might have been partly staged as propaganda to goad the Soviets into wasting money on fruitless psychic research. If that were the case, then letting slip what the target is would actually have been a feature and not a bug in the performance.
22 Comments
Dubious f
3/21/2017 09:57:13 am
"That location was Mars c. 1 million BCE. " The most intriguing part is how did the CIA got hold of a picture or a "readable" location that was a million years ago....
Reply
gdave
3/21/2017 12:19:38 pm
They wouldn't have had a picture. Remote viewing experiments sometimes used a photo of a target. More often, however, they used map coordinates, or sometimes names or descriptions of locations. If this story is at all factual, the envelope would probably have just contained a slip of paper literally saying "Mars c. 1 million BCE". The whole point of the CIA's remote viewing experiments was to gather intelligence on targets they couldn't get through conventional means - particularly targets they couldn't photograph.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
3/21/2017 01:40:45 pm
GDave is right. Here's an equally reputable psychic doing the same thing:
Reply
Scott David Hamilton
3/21/2017 10:22:54 am
Pedantic Doctor Who Trivia Mode: On.
Reply
Naughtius
3/21/2017 01:39:52 pm
If the location was in an envelope, how did he figure it was Mars and not Earth?
Reply
Dubious f
3/21/2017 03:07:10 pm
Well, according to gdave and shane, the paper in the envelope IS the remote location. Probably looked at the envelope toward a sunlit window...
Reply
Bob Jase
3/21/2017 02:28:52 pm
Damn, McGonigle was lucky he wasn't psychicly stepped on by a thoat.
Reply
At Risk
3/21/2017 02:36:23 pm
Frankly, I think it might be good that the CIA wasted its time and resources on psychic probes of ancient Martian civilization, to perhaps distract and limit them from such atrocities as probing the human mind with various drugs:
Reply
Weatherwax
3/21/2017 09:47:08 pm
Sadly, they had plenty of resources to do both and more.
Reply
Americanegro
3/21/2017 05:08:05 pm
Sounds like more Project Stargate nonsense. Remember "Major Ed Dames"? He used to appear on Art Bell's show maybe a couple times a year and his main thing was predicting "The Killshot" a disaster on a planetary scale. Kept moving the date into the future on each visit. If I recall correctly, claimed to have once tried to remote view Satan. Taught something he called "Technical Remote Viewing" to boneheads.
Reply
Pharaon
3/21/2017 05:40:20 pm
And then there's of course the martian sphinx from "Edison conquers the martians".
Reply
Clete
3/22/2017 01:13:57 am
I once knew someone who was arrested for remote viewing. He was using a telescope to look in windows several blocks away. The police, for some reason, took exception to what he was doing.
Reply
Maybe Another Kook
3/22/2017 08:48:04 am
I am surprised the connection between the CIA, Mars and former president Obama has not been extolled more prominently.
Reply
Tom Mellett
3/24/2017 09:07:27 pm
Jason,
Reply
Tom Mellett
3/24/2017 09:16:30 pm
(reached the Comment length limit just before the end)
Reply
Dubious f
3/25/2017 12:15:30 pm
Cydonia was remote read! That reader needed glasses because in reality, that region is way way more intricate than that face picture. http://www.space.com/17191-face-on-mars.html
Reply
mike f
7/16/2017 04:06:12 pm
So it says he had a failed reading about people wearing temporary body tattoos instead of clothes, thats funny because it was a big fad for a while there I even saw a segment on tv about it. They had women walk down the street with painted on clothes in different parts of I think New York or some big city just to see if anyone would notice. So failed prediction...not really a remote viewing does not always give you all the information about what you are seeing, more like bits and pieces of a puzzle.
Reply
1/28/2019 01:21:23 pm
The CIA also started the Stargate project. A research funded center, specifically to investigate paranormal powers. This is obviously effective in war espionage, finding your enemies by remote viewing. In fact they even reveal the project on their site. Nothings hidden anymore.
Reply
Jason why are you so bent on debunking something you know nothing about ? you open your piece with a line that includes the word "silly", this shows closed mindedness and a pre determined conclusion on your part , how do you know this is "silly"? how do you know that in fact you are the "silly" element in all of this , you don't know one way or the other whether this story is genuine or not , the laughable part is that you call yourself an author , a more acurate description would be uneducated hack.
Reply
nick
7/28/2019 03:25:19 pm
Like most professional debunkers, Colavito attempts to weave bits and pieces of the story that, while not false, are strung together to emphasize the absurd to the reader in order to front-load them with the belief that it is all just so much bunk. Notice how he tells reader what to think of this subject from the beginning of the article; specifically "...a silly transcript...".
Reply
Patrick Phelps
8/28/2019 06:55:43 am
Not that I take a stand one way or the other as to the validity or accuracy of remote viewing and its ilk, but I would like to point out that one of the most effective methods of cloaking legitimate programs and operations is to devalue and "debunk" them through the release of disinformation.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
December 2024
|