As though we didn’t have enough evidence that the media are in the throes of a fringe history revival, the Travel Channel released episode descriptions for the first batch of new episodes of America Unearthed, which will debut at the end of the month. It’s a mixed bag, but there is some good news. The topics, while still more Eurocentric than not, have decidedly fewer Templar conspiracy theories than the three seasons that aired on the H2 channel, and the topics seem designed to steer more toward mainstream topics than the esoteric. The bad news, of course, is that host Scott Wolter will be investigating bullshit claims that have already been debunked many times before. I’ll give you the descriptions straight from Discovery Communications’ press release: In the premiere episode, “Vikings in the Desert,” premiering Tuesday, May 28 at 10 p.m. ET/PT, Wolter receives a call about alleged Viking artifacts found in the Arizona desert. Using state-of-the-art XRF (X-ray fluorescence) identification technology and insight from a Viking historian, Wolter starts his search in the southwestern desert. From there, new leads take him to California to excavate a supposed buried Viking ship that might have once sailed America’s vast inland sea and to Mexico to examine a petroglyph depicting what could be Viking travelers. The episode produces some unexpected results and opens the door to further expeditions into where the Vikings went and why. Ugh.
Those with sharp memories will remember that the “Viking ship” in the desert claim appeared in Newsweek in 2017 when the magazine profiled a man described as a working class white man (the article emphasized the racial aspect of fringe history) having a “grievance” against mainstream archaeologists for refusing to believe that a Viking ship is buried in the desert. As I wrote at the time, “According to a guidebook produced by the U.S. government before World War II, the legend of the desert boat was inspired by a real abandoned vessel, built in 1862 for a Colorado river mining company and abandoned in the desert when the cost of transporting it to the Colorado River was too great. Not coincidentally, sightings of the ‘Spanish’ or ‘Viking’ ship began shortly after, in the 1870s.” The episode on aliens seems to be the one per season episode devoted to debunking an obviously false claim to bolster Wolter’s alleged credibility as a straight-shooter. The other two topics don’t interest me at all. Unless Jack the Ripper turns out to be a Templar murdering claimants to the Holy Bloodline’s Magdalene Throne, this seems like another waste of time. Off the top of my head, I’m not sure what Pennsylvania cave is being referred to, but I assume that someone reading this will know. The colonial era isn’t all that exciting for me, so this looks like another snooze, even if it descends into Masonic conspiracies. So we now know the topics for these four episodes plus the Haymarket Riot episode, which total half of the ten-episode season. To judge from these episodes, it looks like the new season is steering away from the paranoid conspiracies of the H2 run toward a more general-interest speculative history closer to the Discovery Communications family of networks’ other documentary and pseudo-documentary series. I’m sure, though, that they’ll find a way to get Templar bloodlines into the show somehow.
127 Comments
Doc Rock
5/3/2019 10:06:57 am
I can't help but think that a lot of Hancock's frustration with the lack of acceptance from real scholars is genuine rather than contrived to generate outrage among his supporters.
Reply
Accumulated Wisdom
5/3/2019 10:10:17 am
"Off the top of my head, I’m not sure what Pennsylvania cave is being referred to, but I assume that someone reading this will know."
Reply
Accumulated Wisdom
5/4/2019 12:01:20 am
Please, allow me to revise my statement.
Reply
Dr. Love Strange
5/4/2019 12:24:38 am
The term has been used before: 5/14/2019 10:20:55 am
Knowing Scott Wolter's proclivities, he is undoubtedly going to tell the story of Johannes Kelpius, the 16th century occultist who lived in a cave near current day Germantown, Pa.
Reply
Jim
5/14/2019 01:04:16 pm
Robert :
Accumulated Wisdom
5/14/2019 01:43:56 pm
My lame joke notwithstanding, IF, the logging company has given him permission to film, someone has chosen to turn the cave into a tourist trap. It's on the Travel Channel after all. I have always been told, "Always follow the money".
Joe Scales
5/3/2019 10:17:53 am
"... I’m not sure what Pennsylvania cave is being referred to, but I assume that someone reading this will know."
Reply
Washing-ton
5/3/2019 11:12:04 am
George believed in the geometry of reason and logic that is way over the head of Scott Wolter
Reply
Jim
5/3/2019 10:31:20 am
Wolter also filmed in the Wemyss Caves, so I would expect at least one episode on Muir's fake Henry Sinclair Journals.
Reply
Accumulated Wisdom
5/3/2019 11:32:03 am
Jim,
Reply
B L
5/3/2019 12:12:39 pm
Gotta say, I love the Scott Wolter critiques on this blog moreso than those of other fringe authors or ideas. There's just something about Wolter that I find very funny. And, despite his narcissism, he's completely defenseless because he's just not that clever.
Reply
Angel & Demon
5/3/2019 12:27:00 pm
Scott Wolter was the winner of the "Real Robert Langdon" contest set by the History Channel long ago
Reply
Copperhead
5/3/2019 01:04:46 pm
It is even more amusing when he is shown to be not so clever in the comments section on his own blog. The lad doesnt seem to have a grasp of the concept of being damned by faint praise either. That is, when he is even willing to post submitted comments.
Reply
Scott Hamilton
5/3/2019 12:27:42 pm
I have some interest in Jack the Ripper, so I’m wondering who they’re fingering. The most obvious “beloved” author of the time is Lewis Carrol, who was once accused of the Ripper crimes based on ridiculous anagrams. I have no idea if he was a Freemason, or what diseases could do with it.
Reply
Ripper crimes
5/3/2019 12:29:44 pm
Newspaper invention (Chris Frayling)
Reply
Scott Hamilton
5/3/2019 12:51:02 pm
“Probably”? Like five different people? No, not probably. Serial killers exist, and most of the series in the fall of 1888 was clearly one killer, escalating. (Copycats don’t escalate.) I would certainly grant that the “canonical five” is a bad construct and using modern criminology should lead us to eliminate Elizabeth Stride as the victim of the same person as the rest, but no, Jack the Ripper is not wholly a newspaper invention. There was someone killing women at night at that time, and that person killed ~5 people.
RIPPER CRIMES
5/3/2019 01:09:48 pm
You can't prove that and there's no forensic evidence. There is evidence that the newspapers, who invented the name "Jack the Ripper", circulations escalated when the murders were attributed to one person
RIPPER CRIMES
5/3/2019 02:24:54 pm
"Shadow of the Ripper", written & presented by Christopher Grayling, produced by John Triffitt. Centenary documentary on Jack the Ripper, 1988 (Timewatch, BBC 2)
Errata
5/3/2019 02:39:54 pm
Christopher Frayling
RIPPER MURDERS
5/3/2019 03:22:08 pm
The "Dear Boss" letter signed "Jack the Ripper" dated 25 September was most likely written by journalist Frederick Best, referred to in a press shareholders 1890 letter by John J. Brunner, M.P. (Revealed: Jack the Ripper Tabloid Killer, produced & directed by Nikki Stoker, Channel Five, 2009)
Jim
5/3/2019 01:08:53 pm
I'm looking forward to the Jack the Ripper episode, should be hilarious.
Reply
Accumulated Wisdom
5/3/2019 01:37:44 pm
Patricia Cornwell had an interesting theory. Unfortunately, I no longer own the book. From what I recall, her best evidence was a watermark on paper used by both the Ripper, and artist Walter Sickert. I fully expect a rehashing of these ideas.
Reply
Doc Rock
5/3/2019 04:28:29 pm
I've got the book. Would have been better if it wasn't so glaringly apparent that she was trying too hard to fit things together.
Cromwell Crap
5/4/2019 04:06:20 am
Ripperologists dismissed Walter Sickert long before Patricia Cromwell wrote her book - read the literature, especially by Paul Begg.
Corny Cornwell
5/4/2019 07:01:20 am
It's only because she's a crime novelist, she was no great expert on Jack the Ripper - she was no real-life sleuth.
Cornwell documentary
5/4/2019 07:07:17 am
Here's the BBC Cornwell documentary
Accumulated Wisdom
5/4/2019 11:15:56 am
@Doc Rock-
Tudlaw
5/5/2019 09:05:24 pm
Things like this just astound me. Nonetheless, welcome Rita. 5/5/2019 07:31:26 pm
There is a book by author Patricia Cornwall, who is author of mainly forensic murder mysteries. She believes a famous author/poet/artist (I cant remember) of the era could have been Jack the Ripper. Maybe this is going off her research.
Reply
Jim
5/5/2019 10:19:32 pm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portrait_of_a_Killer:_Jack_the_Ripper%E2%80%94Case_Closed
Campblor
5/3/2019 07:54:59 pm
I don't care what anyone says, this is the funniest show on TV
Reply
Jim
5/4/2019 02:40:43 am
Breaking News:
Reply
harry
5/6/2019 05:20:09 am
Eh.....so easy to condemn someone who is out there actually doing legwork to try and make historical connections that they themselves are unable to make. I commend Scott Wolter for his work and I dont find him at all the "bozo" here
Reply
Jim
5/6/2019 10:15:24 am
"so easy to condemn someone who is out there actually doing legwork to try and make historical connections that they themselves are unable to make."
Jim
5/6/2019 01:22:17 pm
Scott "Believes Anything" Wolter doing his legwork:
Tudlaw
5/6/2019 03:26:58 pm
Don't forget he spent five years not learning Swedish for his KRS research.
Doc Rock
5/7/2019 05:18:14 am
By legwork he probably means going to various sites for photo ops and collecting sound bites from anyone who will tell him what he wants to hear.
Doc Rock
5/7/2019 05:38:09 am
I can just see it. Wolter and fox staring at a cave painting of an Indian woman scraping a beaver pelt:
Jim
5/7/2019 10:42:13 am
Blue eyed Templar Minoans !
Joe Scales
5/7/2019 12:17:09 pm
"... that they themselves are unable to make. "
Riley V.
5/4/2019 07:04:39 am
America’s inland sea? Wasn’t that the flooded Mississippi River and the Flooded east side of the Rockies?
Reply
Causticacrostic
5/4/2019 08:11:21 am
Tyrannosaurs were the first Viking Freemasons.
Reply
Jim
5/4/2019 10:11:08 am
Templar Vikings ate the Cerutti Mastodon.
Reply
Doc Rock
5/4/2019 09:12:20 pm
They were unusually tidy as usual. Their knives left no cut marks on the bones. They didn't leave a single item of trash after the picnic either. One of the brothers Egbert choked to death on some gristle, but they buried him deeper than those lazy archaeologists are willing to dig. True story.
Paul
5/4/2019 11:15:26 am
Wolters trick of speaking from his mouth and talking out of his arse simultaneously provides four times the entertainment. The channel that he is on should provide 6 hours of real science and history programming to undo the damage that Scottie does in 1.
Reply
Jim
5/4/2019 12:10:38 pm
Blog Post about Wolter:
Reply
Doc Rock
5/7/2019 05:53:27 am
That was an odd exchange. Wolter says the mandans are extinct because of a mid-19th century epidemic and when told otherwise responds that they are agrarian and not full-blooded. I think he was implying that this rules them out for generic testing. Overlooking that because of intermarriage with other tribes and whites it would have been hard to identify "full blooded" mandans even before the epidemic.
Reply
Tudlaw
5/7/2019 09:10:41 pm
Wolter's concern about "full-bloodedness" collides with his myth that the Templars interbred with Indians in the 1300s. But he still sounds like a Nazi.
Jim
5/7/2019 11:12:14 am
http://scottwolteranswers.blogspot.com/2018/12/a-qualified-geologists-peer-review-of.html#comment-form
Reply
Joe Scales
5/7/2019 12:20:48 pm
Perhaps someone could write to this reviewer, and have him come here to answer the concerns of Harold in regard to Wolter's nonsensical, and very unscientific findings, as well as his faulty methodology and abuse of logic.
Reply
Raparee
5/9/2019 09:59:48 am
To quote a great man: "Scott Wolter is an idiot."
Reply
Jim
5/9/2019 09:38:52 am
Gitty up
Reply
Jim
5/9/2019 10:12:22 am
Using google translate:
Reply
Joe Scales
5/9/2019 10:38:28 am
You know what this must mean Jim.
Jim
5/9/2019 11:12:32 am
I heard that the KRS was a copy of a copy of the 90 foot stone that was a copy of a land claim found by La Vérendrye in Alberta.
Patrick Shekleton
5/9/2019 01:47:04 pm
Blog post on the "discovery" was debunked. See Kensington Rune Stone International Supporters Facebook page for post and comments.
Reply
Jim
5/9/2019 03:32:41 pm
No it wasn't debunked !
Reply
Patrick Shekleton
5/9/2019 04:43:24 pm
Technically, you're correct. Speculation isn't fact, so debunking is actually too gracious of a word to use. There is no established provenance of when the rune forms were drawn onto the wall...looks to be with crayon and a pencil. The staple gun staple in the wood is a tell, Paul Edwards called that one right. The 5mil equated to what, 80 kilometers? Hardly the same neighborhood as where Ohman once lived. No established connection that Ohman was at that farm - ever. Again, we are presented with "secret" tradesmen runes as the story. Just as in the case of the wooden fraternity paddle, which has no diagnostically established date assigned to it, we are supposed to uncritically accept that the mere presence of runic letters - not an inscription - is evidence that these were drawn on the wall prior to 1898. That hasn't been established, nor can it be established. Kallstrom came nowhere close to establishing it. The bigger point is that you and your buddy on this blog automatically praise anything that remotely suggests a modern-era provenance for the KRS. Case in point - this recent BLOG post from Kallstrom. You uncritically swallow...hook, line, and sinker... the speculation that the runic scholar, Kallstrom, serves up.
Jim
5/9/2019 06:05:55 pm
" There is no established provenance of when the rune forms were drawn onto the wall...looks to be with crayon and a pencil."
Jim
5/9/2019 06:39:49 pm
" Case in point - this recent BLOG post from Kallstrom. You uncritically swallow...hook, line, and sinker... the speculation that the runic scholar, Kallstrom, serves up."
Kent
5/9/2019 08:23:03 pm
Patrick, I'm sorry to say that like Scott Wolter and Anthony Warren you may be an idiot. When was the wall built? That's T 0 for dating purposes. The wooden "fraternity paddle" (your words) is certainly susceptible to carbon dating and in fact such dating has been done, establishing a floor for its age.
Joe Scales
5/9/2019 08:31:59 pm
Patrick, you imbecile.
Jim
5/9/2019 08:42:48 pm
Here is a kicker for you Kent.
Patrick Shekleton
5/9/2019 09:29:32 pm
Mansta Yoke (1907); runes shown to be copied from newspaper article about KRS (Nielsen & Wolter 2006). Still asserted to be evidence for basis of KRS runes. Wrong.
Reply
Joe Scales
5/10/2019 09:38:43 am
"Larrson Rune Row (LRR) (1883/1885). Homework assignment. No established basis for runic glyphs, the “secret” trade guild runes is nothing but speculation."
Reply
Patrick Shekleton
5/9/2019 09:46:38 pm
Original comment, Joe. We can see that you are continuing to mature. Kent is using you as his mentor. On another note, the carbon dating of the [name it] will only establish when the tree was cut down. It won't establish when the inscription was carved into the wood - although that will be what is asserted. They can do all the due diligence on the [name it] they want but the provenance of the inscription cannot be dated - only the wood can. Plenty of old buildings over in Europe, recycle the reclaimed wood, and do an inscription. Post-1898 inscription on a re-milled piece of lumber. Could have been done post-1898 and before the advent of C14 dating, as a matter of convenience, or it could have been a purposeful approach after C14 dating came about. If someone "produced" a runic inscription on wood in North America, the exact same argument would be tendered to debunk any potential dating results of the wood.
Reply
Kent
5/9/2019 10:34:32 pm
Patriick,
Reply
Kent
5/10/2019 12:01:28 am
Oh, Patrick. I'm not arguing that the stick is old, simply saying it must date to when the tree was killed or sometime after. My money is on the 19th century.
Joe Scales
5/10/2019 09:40:56 am
"We can see that you are continuing to mature."
Reply
Patrick
5/10/2019 06:58:27 am
Kent, thanks for pointing out my misuse of the word provenance. You are absolutely correct.
Reply
Jim
5/10/2019 10:00:57 am
Patrick:
Reply
Jim
5/10/2019 10:09:17 am
ig·no·rance
Reply
Whiskey Dick
5/10/2019 10:52:52 am
Why smear my ears with jamb and tie me an ant hill. Thet there is more evidence that rascal Minnesota Viking stone is a later manifestation of the eighteen double oughts. That varrmit Patty Cakes Shekelton could be showed documented evidence of the Vikings stones falehoods and still cling to his bros. Grim view of why some low down sidewinders would pull such a prank as the Minnesota Viking stone in the first place. Its hard to admit if a feller has put years of belief into such an obviously bogus Viking Stone. It boggles the mind how many of these modern history dudes cling to notions that were first ciphered in the eighteen double oughts. Livin' in the past is no way to go through life Flounder. He he. Next Patty Cakes will be ciphering how aliens from another planet actually made thet there Minnesota Viking stone! I'm off to fix the cattle tank on the north forty. So long pardners.
Reply
Patrick
5/10/2019 03:56:15 pm
"As in show me a hooked X representing the letter A anywhere in the universe that existed in the 14th century. You can't."
Reply
Joe Scales
5/10/2019 04:18:40 pm
Patrick, you imbecile. A shotgun response of pure nonsense doesn't cut it.
Reply
Patrick
5/10/2019 04:16:46 pm
Here's an X, transliterated as an -AE ligature, matched to the 13th century lexicon of Northern England, contained within a runic inscription: https://www.facebook.com/114338978642314/photos/a.1407902479285951/1953530691389791/?type=3&theater. This pre-dates the use of the X for the letter -A in the Dalecarlian runes by three centuries.
Reply
Joe Scales
5/10/2019 04:22:25 pm
Wishful thinking and more nonsense. You imbecile.
Reply
Patrick
5/10/2019 06:04:48 pm
Study up on the Narragansett Rune Stone (NRS) runes: https://www.facebook.com/114338978642314/photos/a.1407948279281371/1450820034994195/?type=3&theater
Reply
Jim
5/11/2019 11:11:45 am
Patrick
Reply
Joe Scales
5/11/2019 11:40:36 am
Imbecile Patrick is just as disingenuous as our boy Wolter. I mean, just look above. How a discussion in regard to a hooked X becomes "an X". Then of course there was his reverse negative image debacle where he couldn't see the chancel for the trees.
Jim
5/11/2019 12:05:39 pm
"Imbecile Patrick is just as disingenuous as our boy Wolter."
Kent
5/11/2019 06:02:34 pm
This zesty exchange led me to the summary idea the Freemasons are the professional wrestlers of spirituality. Think about it: they all call each other "Brother".
Doc Rock
5/12/2019 11:39:15 am
With all due respect to Native American oral traditions, there needs to be a drinking game where every time a fringe proponent throws out something along the lines of "an old Indian told me" in support of their wacked out theory everyone has to do a shot of rotgut whiskey.
Jim
5/11/2019 08:31:29 pm
I just ran across another hooked X !
Reply
Patrick
5/12/2019 02:54:47 pm
Good report by Professor Weiblen.
Reply
Jim
5/12/2019 04:45:34 pm
I agree Patrick, so let me ask you a few questions.
Patrick
5/12/2019 06:39:09 pm
Jim, in the last 24 hours you have called me ignorant and agreed with Joe's statement that I am "just as disingenuous as our boy Wolter." Now you are inclined to ask me some questions. So you can then do the same thing again.
Joe Scales
5/12/2019 07:23:12 pm
Patrick, you imbecile.
Patrick
5/12/2019 07:23:24 pm
Jim et al,
Joe Scales
5/12/2019 07:35:36 pm
Patrick, you imbecile. If anyone is falsifying data, it's Wolter. He couldn't even be counted on to honestly convey the wording of the York Rites Ritual, when anyone could have simply looked it up to discredit his foolish code imbecility. To this day Wolter will not admit his bungling. Just like you won't admit that reverse image showed trees and not the remnants of a chancel. You want credibility here, then admit what we all know. That would be a good first step.
Jim
5/12/2019 08:16:06 pm
Patrick:
Patrick
5/12/2019 08:02:57 pm
For you, Joe, some more reading on Thalbitzer and the Hooked X: https://www.facebook.com/114338978642314/photos/a.114955778580634/2168542349888623/?type=3&theater
Reply
Patrick
5/12/2019 08:24:49 pm
:)
Reply
Joe Scales
5/13/2019 08:55:13 am
Patrick, you complete imbecile. You do not have a hooked X representing the letter A in the 14th century. Period.
Reply
Jim
5/12/2019 09:00:57 pm
Patrick:
Reply
Patrick
5/12/2019 09:53:58 pm
You're certified, Jim. You always have been. I read the Nielsen paper. It remarks specifically that there is no biotite on the section of the core sample that Weiblen analyzed. I read Michlovics 2010 article and he says biotite was found on the KRS. How is that? Michlovic would not have bypassed a mention that the 127 sampled areas from the core section had ZERO biotite, but he did. Because there are 2 versions of the report. And it is the Nielsen version that looks to be off. Scream all you want, but that Nielsen version is suspect until there is a plausible explanation. You and Joe aren't going to find one, so shut your pieholes.
Reply
Patrick
5/12/2019 09:41:19 pm
There's no bullshit coming from me. The reports are significantly different. The commentary from you and Joe doesn't change that FACT. Folks can view both reports. You provided the link to Nielsen's site, I scanned the copy out of Hanson's book. There might be a plausible reason, but right now none of us can say with certainty. Nielsen's report doesn't strike me as the finished product of a Professor Emeritus. I would expect to see a revision remark, at a minimum. There is none. Dr. Weiblen does a formal technical report published in Hanson's book, then he turns around and produced what we find on Nielsen's web site? It seems out of place.
Reply
Jim
5/12/2019 09:54:54 pm
What the hell are you talking about ?
Reply
Kent
5/12/2019 10:33:14 pm
My reading agrees with Jim's Patrick. Now that the crucial passage has been shown to exist in both versions, perhaps you could point out the differences you found?
Jim
5/12/2019 11:11:00 pm
http://scottwolteranswers.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-lost-templar-journals-of-prince.html#comment-form
Reply
Patrick
5/13/2019 05:37:24 am
Yep, the sentence is the same in both. Tired eyes. I stand corrected.
Joe Scales
5/13/2019 08:52:31 am
Now why don't you try looking for trees in place of your beloved chancel, Patrick. You complete imbecile.
Patrick
5/13/2019 06:14:41 am
Weiblen found no presence of biotite in his analysis on KRS PTS 1 or 2. These samples were interior surface samples on the KRS that had not been exposed to weathering. No biotite present, as I understand it. Do I have this correct?
Reply
Patrick
5/13/2019 07:07:58 am
There is no way around the fact that there is no biotite in the plug/core sample that Dr. Weiblen analyzed. It wasn't present, according to Weiblen. Wolter states that Weiblen analyzed the weathered, top surface. This doesn't appear to mesh with what is written in Weiblen's report. Given that the tombstone study used biotite as the primary "weathering" material for comparison, it is important to have that material identified in the KRS. It clearly isn't in the plug/core samples (PTS 1 and 2).
Reply
Jim
5/13/2019 10:03:14 am
Let's just ignore this:
Jin
5/13/2019 10:08:09 am
Patrick:
Jim
5/13/2019 10:41:28 am
And since Patrick wants to turn this into another marathon crap fest, we might just as well touch on Wolters nonsensical position concerning the alleged "peer reviews".
Reply
Patrick
5/13/2019 11:37:26 am
No argument. "No matter how you look at it, it is not very satisfactory. The tombstone study was based on biotite, so it is critical to establish by more than just one data point that biotite is present in the KRS matrix (on the interior, unweathered section). Only then can one assert that the biotite on the exterior surfaces has weathered away." Even the one data point has been called into question.
Reply
Jim
5/13/2019 12:28:37 pm
"Jim, you seem to be pretty good on this peer review thing. Has ANY published material cited in the discussion on the KRS, NT, SPR, or NRS undergone a double-blind peer review? Perhaps Henrik Williams 2014 preliminary report on the Narragansett rune stone? Erik Walhlgren's books? The C14 mortar dating results prior to their release at a press conference in 1993? "
Doc Rock
5/13/2019 02:23:43 pm
I'm not aware of any published peer-reviewed research that supports any of these fringe claims, but that doesn't mean it is absent. If one did publish in a peer reviewed journal then there would no doubt be a vigorous debate that played out through time. Since people are unwilling or unable to submit their work for peer review the end result is the type of discussion here where the story has to be pieced together from multiple sources.
Jim
5/13/2019 03:39:01 pm
Right you are Doc, one has only to read the comments made by Harold Edwards in Jason's recent blog post:
Doc Rock
5/13/2019 04:34:12 pm
Jim,
Harold Edwards
5/14/2019 12:56:05 pm
There is no biotite in the sandstone (graywacke) that makes up the Kensington Stone. Period. This paper will explain why:
Reply
Doc Rock
5/14/2019 01:15:08 pm
Harold,
Jim
5/14/2019 02:00:31 pm
Nice, thanks for weighing in Harold.
Harold Edwards
5/14/2019 03:06:59 pm
As has been pointed out again and again over the years, Wolter's characterization of "peer review" is not the same as the term is used in academic publishing. Typically an editor of a journal will submit copies of the draft paper to two or more specialists in the field. Their names are usually concealed from the author to help insure "impartiality." These individuals will then comment on the paper to help the editor make the final decision on publication and to suggest potential revisions to help improve the paper. This is not what Wolter has done here. Here the "reviewer" is a John Parks who has a background in geophysics. That is not the specialty involved in rock weathering analysis. Depending on how much work he had put into bringing his understanding of the issues involved up to the level needed to evaluate Wolter's work, his opinion can range from useless to excellent. I have never heard of "The petrographic report (Pet Report SW 101203)." Where is that to be found? Much of what is on Wolter's blog seems to be from his book chapter 3 which in turn is from his drafts of 2003.
Doc Rock
5/15/2019 08:41:44 pm
Harold,
Harold Edwards
5/18/2019 01:33:55 am
To answer DOC ROCK's question: Specialists who evaluate the age of lithic artifacts are called archaeologists. Specialists who evaluate mica weathering are called soil scientists. Specialists who evaluate the deterioration of rocks are called engineering geologists and geomorphologists. The latter are often physical geographers and not geologists. I do not believe Mr. Parks has a background in any of these disciplines. He may be a great autodidact, but that has yet to be established. He obviously is a friend of Mr. Wolter. What else can one say?
Jim
5/14/2019 01:37:36 pm
It looks like they have changed up the order of the America Unearthed episodes and added a few snippets of info.
Reply
Jim
5/15/2019 06:25:05 pm
As if falsely accusing Richard Nielsen of falsifying Professor Weiblen's Report wasn't enough Patrick has now attacked Magnus Källström and Henrik Williams using nonsensical and unsubstantiated made up crap.
Reply
Kent
5/15/2019 07:26:54 pm
So because magic markers were invented in the 20th century no one who carved stones previously would have more than one tool? Don't know or care where Patrick was going with this but people in the Stone Age had more than one tool.
Reply
Jim
5/16/2019 11:09:22 am
I get get what you are saying however Facebook can be a powerful propaganda tool.
Kent
5/16/2019 06:31:05 pm
When Joe Louis defended his heavyweight title a record number of times it was dubbed The Bum of the Month Tour. Muhammad Ali once asked him "Would I be a bum to you?" and Louis responded "You would have been on the tour."
Jim
5/20/2019 04:22:29 pm
More on Wolters "Vikings in the Desert"
Reply
Jim
5/20/2019 05:29:35 pm
https://www.discoverbaja.com/2015/09/21/rock-art-sites-of-baja-california/
Reply
Jim
5/27/2019 04:16:59 pm
https://www.spreaker.com/user/10876523/lo-s02e02-final
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|