Today I have some disconnected odds and ends to share. Yesterday I reported on Newsweek’s “special edition” going inside the world of secret societies, and I discussed how slipshod and crappy the content was. I also mentioned that Newsweek’s ancient rival, Time, is also in the business of producing sensationalized supermarket checkout “special editions.” Well, what should I discover when I went to the supermarket this morning but that Time does in fact have an identical “special edition” under its Life brand! It’s another magazine about “secret societies” and promises the exact same revelations. This was too bizarre to be a coincidence, and upon further investigation it appears that the Life edition was first published in 2012 and was rushed back to store shelves to compete with the Newsweek version. What a “win” for readers! Ancient Aliens viewers seem to have finally discovered that the series is now airing new episodes on the History Channel rather than H2. The ratings for Friday’s episode are in, and 1.382 million viewers watched the program at 9:00 PM, nearly rivaling the 1.430 million who watched Bering Sea Gold on the Discovery Channel at the same time. While that might seem like a dramatic turnaround for the show, Ancient Aliens drew just 300,000 viewers between the ages of 18 and 49, compared to 400,000 for Bering Sea Gold. The amazing thing is that Ancient Aliens attracts nearly the same audience no matter what day or time it airs.
Meanwhile, I received an unusual email yesterday from a woman who claims that she and her husband have signed a contract to produce a documentary for the History Channel about the Dare Stones, the twentieth century hoax inscriptions that purported to show the final whereabouts of the lost colony of Roanoke in Georgia. One might think that History had had enough of the Dare Stones, especially after Scott Wolter discussed them on America Unearthed, spawning one of the series’ most hostile and aggressive confrontations. But that isn’t enough, I guess. No fringe theory, no matter how ridiculous, is ever dead enough for the History Channel not to cycle through it every couple of years. I’m withholding the woman’s name for now because I haven’t been able to confirm any of the details. The woman accused me of stealing her research in reviewing that episode of America Unearthed (she felt she was responsible for “90%” of the review and that she deserved credit for the historical background I derived from a 1941 Saturday Evening Post article and Brown’s Guide to Georgia, my acknowledged sources), and then she asked me to appear on the show because the show needs a “skeptic.” I’d never heard of the woman, but from I was able to gather she seems to be legitimate; however, I told her to have a producer or executive producer contact me since I have no way of knowing who is really behind the email. I have a hard time imagining this will be going forward.
22 Comments
tm
4/29/2015 04:47:44 am
If this woman thinks you stole her research, I would think that means she questions your integrity. Kind of scary to wonder how that translates into an offer to be on her show.
Reply
Kal
4/29/2015 05:39:30 am
A review or citation of other works if fair use under the DMCA. You merely have to cite sources. It is not plagiarism. If she is that confounded about how her research went, she should take it up with the editor that researched for the show. If you weren't featured on the show, how can you have stolen it? It's a review, right? It's funny these people are so paranoid of their stuff, which you likely google searched for like everyone else. If anything she should blame google, and you could cite sources in an addendum to the review, which you did here.
Reply
BigMike
4/29/2015 02:50:50 pm
Darn... I rather fancy the idea of under-bridge dwelling mythological beasts claiming responsibility for Jason's independent research...
Reply
bkd69
4/29/2015 07:10:54 pm
Maybe that's how the trolls developed in Shadowrun...They belonged to families that made money from patent trolling, DMCA abuse, and copyright extension lobbying.
Bob Jase
4/29/2015 06:39:51 am
Dammit Jason, the woman is an arkleologist not an atturney!
Reply
David Bradbury
4/29/2015 06:53:20 am
"The amazing thing is that Ancient Aliens attracts nearly the same audience no matter what day or time it airs. "
Reply
4/29/2015 06:58:37 am
The published ratings are live plus same day, which advertisers here feel best represents the people most likely to be influenced by time-sensitive advertising. Nielsen also collects +3 days and +7 days viewing (I believe), but those numbers aren't published regularly as "official" ratings because they aren't as important to advertisers. I'm certain that the "Ancient Aliens" numbers increase markedly when DVR and legal and illegal streaming are factored in. However, I can only work with the numbers I'm given!
Reply
David Bradbury
4/29/2015 09:06:25 am
Eek; I was assuming it was a +3. If that's the overnight figure, I really hope the live-vs-recorded equation doesn't work the same way in America as in the UK.
Only Me
4/29/2015 08:13:34 am
Is this the new insanity? How can you "steal" someone's research if you've collected the same data from the same sources that have been made publicly available?
Reply
Shane Sullivan
4/29/2015 08:34:52 am
Why don't you ask Rob Simone, the author of the Epic of Gilgamesh? =P
Reply
Only Me
4/29/2015 09:46:44 am
Or Scott Reaney, who "invented" compiling newspaper articles about giants?
EP
4/29/2015 08:42:06 am
I believe that there used to be a rule of thumb in the music industry according to which you know you made it once three artists have accused you of plagiarism...
Reply
WinstonP
4/29/2015 08:29:29 am
http://variety.com/2015/tv/news/vice-h2-a-and-e-1201483429/
Reply
4/29/2015 08:46:16 am
Ha! Now we know why Ancient Aliens moved back to History. Will there be room for America Unearthed with one less (fake) history channel?
Reply
SkepticalWatcher2412
4/29/2015 02:41:03 pm
The show is over
mhe
4/29/2015 09:55:24 am
Oh my!
Reply
FrankenNewYork
4/29/2015 05:48:42 pm
I know it's a little non-sequitur but I can't wait until AA and Hangar 1 and every other fringe show can get around to working the story of the Finnish navy dropping depth charges to harass a USO (something that may have been a submarine or maybe submerged garbage. It is unidentified after all) into production so I can see their take on the incident. Old ones? Secret alien base? Nazi saucer? Maybe one of each.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
4/29/2015 06:07:01 pm
Could it be... HitlerALFthulhu?
Reply
FrankenNewYork
4/30/2015 02:46:30 am
I honestly didn't think of HitlerALFthulhu, good job you, but I'll hold off any further personal speculation until I hear David Childress say "Possibly extraterrestrials?" and then I'll probably still go with submarine. Those Ruskies do like to sneak around in fjords for some reason. But I want to let AA make their case.
Only Me
4/29/2015 06:33:20 pm
Speaking of odds and ends, part of an episode of "NASA's Unexplained Files" last night talked about the Gervase of Canterbury account of the flame shooting from the moon. They also included the virtually ignored Stuart's Event, summed up nicely here:
Reply
4/29/2015 11:33:36 pm
They stop at 1947, so I don't believe they mention it.
Reply
David Bradbury
4/30/2015 01:55:39 am
My take on the location, based on a superimposition of the Stuart image over a superbly detailed photo of the area round Pallas crater from http://www.lpod.org/?m=20061102 is here:
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|