William Henry: "I Wanted to Throw Up" Due to Ancient Aliens' Mistakes, "Manipulative Tendencies"10/2/2014 In my blog post about Chad Stuemke’s claims about Detroit, I mentioned that I had done an interview with Stuemke’s friend and colleague, Ancient Aliens pundit William Henry, for Henry’s Revelations radio show and that this interview never aired. Yesterday Henry took the time to stop by my blog and insult me as “psycho” and “creepy” and to claim that he did me a favor by removing audio of the interview he did with me in April 2012. He also wanted to remind my readers that despite the acknowledged similarity between his telephone booth wormholes and Doctor Who’s TARDIS (and between his star gates and the movie Stargate), I am wrong to suggest an inspiration in science fiction: This is another fine example of you not having a clue what you are talking about, Jason. While you pretend to be able to read people's minds and know the the (sic) sources of all things (you simply don't have abilities in either area), I will gladly take a valuable moment out of my Egypt tour to correct you (once again). I derived the phone booth = ascension chamber idea from the ancient Egyptians. […] I did air your interview on Revelations. However, because you came across as psycho and creepy I decided to take it down to save face…yours, not mine. I have not discussed the specifics of this event because, frankly, I have tried not to be a dick. But, writing from Cairo, Henry has chosen to make misleading statements about me, so I will of course set the record straight using Henry’s own words from the emails we exchanged in April 2012, when Henry accused Ancient Aliens of fraud and then went crawling back to them for free airtime after working the anger out of his system. The story starts on April 6, 2012, when H2 broadcasted Ancient Aliens S04E08 “The Da Vinci Conspiracy” in which William Henry was seen describing Leonardo da Vinci as a time traveler who teleported out of a cave. At the time I did not know him from dirt and did not bother mentioning his name in my review, which criticized the show for its inaccuracies and awful logic. Here’s how I described Henry’s claim in that review: We finish up with the absurd claim that Leonardo was obsessed with nature because he discovered a star gate in a cave, letting him teleport to the future to steal the plans for the technologies he then pretended were his own inventions. If these ancient astronaut theorists know so much about it, how come they can’t show us these star gates? Not even one? On April 23, 2012 Henry sent me an email to praise my review and to accuse the producers of Ancient Aliens of committing fraud. Here is the text of the email, in Henry’s own words, with the original typographical errors: I enjoyed your blog about Ancient Alien's "DaVinci" program. Many thanks for writing it. I agree with much of what you said. I too was disgusted when I saw this episode. In particular, I wanted to throw up when I saw what the did to me. They have me saying DaVinci entered a cave and teleported to the future! In actuality, my statement was made during an interview about Jesus! When I contacted the show's producers and asked them to remove my comments they told me it was an honest mistake that would be very expensive to correct. I agreed to be interviewed on his Revelations radio show, and Henry quickly made plain that he wanted me to blast the show and attack it so he could get even with the producers. He then asked me to appear on his show to discuss Ancient Aliens and critical thinking. Note that he told me in a follow up email later that same day that he found me “informed, caring, and honest.” Here are his words, verbatim: I'd really like to focus on Ancient Aliens and the way they stretch things, plus any current blogs you''re interested in discussing. Please let me know if there is anything special you'd like to discuss. Thus, when I spoke with Henry it was no surprise that he spent much of the 30-minute interview discussing his experiences on Ancient Aliens and goading me into attacking various ancient astronaut theorists and their works for falsification and problems with the truth. Henry gave me the date when the show would air, but when the date came it did not air. I checked for several weeks afterward, and it was never broadcasted. Henry now says he pulled the audio after it aired, but I cannot confirm that the show was ever available for the public to hear.
When Henry began appearing more regularly on Ancient Aliens and was promoted to one of the series’ top talking heads, it became rather clear to me that the episode did not air because it would have created problems with the producers whose favor he was seemingly trying to curry. I did not make a big deal out of this at the time—programs are cancelled or bumped all the time—and I had no desire to make trouble for Henry if he decided he had seen the light and no longer wanted to openly antagonize his outlet to the mainstream media. Therefore, I never spoke of these events. As late as January of this year, Henry was still writing me messages praising me for “Nice work on your blog.” Somehow, though, things have now changed. Therefore, it is my duty to inform my readers of what really happened since I can’t let Henry’s false accusations stand, nor can I allow Henry to present one face to my readers while showing another in his correspondence. (As business rather than private correspondence, I have no compunction about publishing these emails; he wrote them in his capacity as radio host.) Make of it what you will. Henry may have removed my interview from his website, but it certainly was not to save me from embarrassment. The facts tell a different story.
57 Comments
EP
10/2/2014 02:22:27 am
OWNED!
Reply
Drew
10/2/2014 02:44:44 am
Missing the part following "Here’s verbatim what he told me to do on the show:"
Reply
10/2/2014 03:00:36 am
Thanks for pointing that out. I had edited the post, and the sentences got out of order. I moved it back where it was supposed to go.
Reply
666
10/2/2014 03:22:18 am
William Henry is trying to prop up a subject matter that has been existing on Life Support Machine for a good decade
Reply
King Alan 1st
10/4/2018 02:52:17 pm
You Are Going To Want To Read This. The Occult / Masons, The Windsor Filth And The Catholic Church Exposed. By May's Son. King Alan 1st. The Miraculous / True King of England.
Reply
Tyler
11/26/2019 01:26:06 pm
What is this? 12/30/2019 02:24:43 am
He seems childish when he talks, like a little suck up kid omg.
Reply
Scott Hamilton
10/2/2014 03:22:59 am
Oh, so it was Jesus who time travelled from a cave. Now it makes perfect sense!
Reply
666
10/2/2014 03:34:41 am
Jesus didn't exist to the Dualists.
Reply
666
10/2/2014 03:35:54 am
Less of this "Jesus was a myth" didn't exist in antiquity from mainstream dogmatic boloney, please
666
10/2/2014 03:44:26 am
The story of doubting Thomas in the gospels was evidently invented to deal with those Christians who rejected the physical substance of Christ
Byron DeLear
10/2/2014 04:51:25 am
666, your one-sided characterization of Gnostic tenets is self-serving. But with a handle like 666, makes sense. Gnostic teachings, beliefs, etc. run the gamut and are diverse.
Only Me
10/2/2014 05:21:13 am
Agreed. Less of your "self-educated" dogmatic baloney, please.
666
10/2/2014 05:49:40 am
Do you want me to copy and paste lots and lots of passages from Gnostic texts
666
10/2/2014 05:51:16 am
>> Less of your "self-educated" dogmatic baloney, please
666
10/2/2014 05:55:39 am
Here you go, no historical basis for the biography of Jesus whatsoever in this gnostic passage from The Gospel of Philip
Only Me
10/2/2014 06:32:59 am
"You obviously have never read a single Gnostic text in your entire life"
An Over-Educated Grunt
10/2/2014 07:06:13 am
If only, OM. If only we got to hear, for instance, how Judaism and Islam both drew on long-standing pagan traditions in the Near and Middle East, how Mohammed's visions were clearly due to eating pomegranates, how the Ikko monks of Japan were, for supposed pacifists, incredibly violent, how Hindu creationists propose a scientifically impossible timeline for the Earth... nope, it's always Jesus Jesus Jesus. For someone who claims to hate ecumenically, I think that "intolerant of any and all religion" is a kindness too far.
Only Me
10/2/2014 07:33:16 am
Your right, Grunt. I stand corrected.
EP
10/2/2014 07:43:23 am
I've read *lots* of Gnostic texts.
Shane Sullivan
10/2/2014 08:38:24 am
"I've read *lots* of Gnostic texts."
Duke of URL
10/2/2014 04:41:54 am
12 minutes... Is that a new record?
Reply
Only Me
10/2/2014 05:21:46 am
Yep.
666
10/2/2014 05:52:19 am
>>>12 minutes... Is that a new record?
EP
10/2/2014 11:19:07 am
They didn't deny his existence. If you infer it from the fact that they favored non-literal readings of sacred texts, you're committing a fallacy.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
10/2/2014 03:57:25 pm
Gotcha. I hoped to illustrate that 666, in his repeated claims over the months, has confused the rejection of Jesus as God the Son/Son of God/prophet of God with the rejection of Jesus' existence.
EP
10/2/2014 04:11:13 pm
Yeah, I realized I'd misrepresented you, but was too lazy to correct myself... Sorry!
Only Me
10/2/2014 04:16:34 pm
@Shane
EP
10/2/2014 04:23:17 pm
By the way, rejecting human Jesus doesn't really mean rejecting historical Jesus. It's just a (false) view of the nature of historical Jesus - that he is a spritiual or divine entity of some sort.
Shane Sullivan
10/2/2014 06:37:54 pm
Only Me, I thought perhaps I was missing something, because I couldn't figure out how that passage was supposed to prove what he said it did... glad I'm not the only one.
EP
10/3/2014 05:18:04 am
Shane, I think there are some typos in your question, but as far as I understand it, the type of view you're referring to was quite widespread and isn't specifically Gnostic. Several major early Christian heresies could be described as holding something like that. In fact, it's quite natural if you wish to accept Son of God and Salvation, but don't want to get into the bizarre debates about duality of Christ and the Trinity.
Shane Sullivan
10/3/2014 08:25:21 am
No, it's not Gnostic by nature (sounds like a 90s music group...), I was just curious if there were any known Gnostic sects that embraced it.
EP
10/3/2014 08:53:09 am
You're welcome, though I don't feel like I've done a very good job :)
Zach
10/2/2014 06:06:41 am
Hey Jason, did William Henry explain why, during his segment for the da Vinci episode in which he was misquoted in, was even brought up? He claimed that was in regards to a quote he said about Jesus. I thought both Von Daniken and the show swore off not alienating their audience by not bringing Jesus up? Did he ever inform you as to why he was talking about Jesus coming upon a stargate in the first place?
Reply
10/2/2014 06:14:39 am
No, he didn't, though he has always taken a more spiritual tack than the other ancient astronaut theorists.
Reply
EP
10/2/2014 06:21:02 am
666 is a valuable and repected commenter on this blog.
Reply
DanD
10/2/2014 11:13:25 am
repected,= respected? Nah, rejected more like it.....lol
Reply
EP
10/2/2014 11:24:48 am
I was on my iphone, give me a break :)
Not Rev Phil Gotsch
10/2/2014 04:32:51 pm
I have been friends with 666 for 25 years and can assure you that he is not an asshole.
Reply
Kal
10/2/2014 08:20:31 am
Could you post the audio of that interview on your end, or a transcript of it?
Reply
An Over-Educated Grunt
10/2/2014 09:47:54 am
Funny you should mention Tolkien. I conclusively "proved" to my wife today using AA logic that, encoded in Tolkien's work, is clear proof that the Jesus bloodline is descended from aliens. There is a hidden king who returns to save humanity (Aragorn), who is descended from an ancient, noble bloodline (the High Kings of Numenor, descended from Earendil), who arrived in the lands of Middle-Earth after the destruction of their homeland (Numenor). The Numenoreans lived for hundreds of years, and were descended from Earendil, a man who became a star. Clearly, this is code for the Annunaki-Watchers seeding the Earth with an ancient, noble bloodline which ruled Atlantis, and was fated to reveal itself at a moment of crisis to provide a savior-king! The Holy Bloodline isn't just divine, it's also alien, descended from Those Who From The Heavens Came! It's all right there in Tolkien!
Reply
EP
10/2/2014 11:22:37 am
Only the rulers of Numenor and their progeny descended from Earendil.
An Over-Educated Grunt
10/2/2014 01:56:38 pm
But Aragorn, the hidden savior-king, was the last lineal descendant of the kings of Numenor. My argument stands. :P
EP
10/2/2014 02:11:11 pm
He had children with the elven chick who was his distant relative. His progeny became kings of Arnor and Gondor.
Jerky
10/2/2014 03:31:44 pm
It was a hobbit who saved humanity, by destroying the one ring, So where dose that fit into it?
.
10/2/2014 04:15:11 pm
Gollum is the Savior of Humanity? Frodo only went into Mordor.
Jerky
10/2/2014 05:46:06 pm
Yes, Gollum did take the ring back, but Frodo had tackled Gollum grasping for the ring. That knocked both Gollum and the hobbit off that edge, putting both the ring and Gollum into the fires of Mt. Doom. So my point still stands. The hobbit saved humanity not the "hidden savior-king".
M.a.
7/7/2017 10:31:09 am
The translation "those who from the heavens came" is a Stitchen translation, and is considered by many to be a mis translation. ROYAL Seed or Royal Blood is a better translation
Walt
10/2/2014 11:50:02 am
Oh, so when you said Henry undoubtedly took the idea from Dr. Who, you were merely making a suggestion? What a manipulative load of crap. Either stand by the logical statement you made and argue with the guy, or apologize for stating something as fact that turned out be incorrect.
Reply
10/2/2014 12:59:36 pm
Would you like something more definitive, Walt? I believe that there is undoubtedly influence from Doctor Who, but that doesn't mean that Henry was aware of the influence. I once wrote a short story that I did not realize for five years was quite clearly inspired by an episode of Supernatural--the details were all different, and the story wasn't the same at all, but the imagery bore an unmistakable similarity and I didn't even notice until I caught the episode in reruns just this year, nearly a decade after it aired and almost six years after writing the story.
Reply
EP
10/2/2014 01:46:54 pm
Wait, are you the "it's all just entertainment, don't get worked up over it" Walt?
Reply
Zach
10/2/2014 07:40:35 pm
Walt, if you are that blind that you can't see that a lying hack like Henry clearly ripped off a famous device and trope from popular science fiction, and will fight Jason on your bullshit rhetoric than you really are the ignorant sheep you are proving yourself to be. Stop fighting people on their semantics (which you twist based on your idiotic logic) and look in front of you to see that the real problem is that William Henry is one more example that Ancient Aliens is full of backstabbing, manipulating frauds. These people supposedly call each other colleagues based around the cause of alternative history. Think about that for that and stop harassing Jason, who's doing his job by reporting on this son of a bitch's lack of ethics and professionalism.
Reply
Zach
10/2/2014 08:47:01 pm
Edit: Think about that * and stop harassing Jason, who's doing his job by reporting on this son of a bitch's lack of ethics and professionalism.
Walt
10/3/2014 06:59:52 am
Nothing I said should indicate to you that I don't think Henry ripped off the TARDIS. That wasn't the point at all, and I didn't even address it. I'm a whovian going back to the 80s but William Henry is someone I've never heard of, and probably won't remember exists in about an hour.
Mark L
10/2/2014 08:24:52 pm
Please reply, Mr. Henry. I'd love to know what you have to say about this.
Reply
Harry
10/3/2014 12:52:23 am
Jason,
Reply
Ignatz
2/21/2015 08:13:58 am
Jason, I did hear the interview early on a Saturday morning, and it was very confusing, because here was WH interviewing a critic of Ancient Aliens and he was pushing you to say something negative about the show. I remember hearing you raise the pitch of your voice, trying to back out of it. That's why he took it down, it didn't make any sense and he must have received comments from his listeners telling him so. And also, like you say, risking his relationship with the producers of the show. Pretty devious and underhanded to come back at you trying to save face, and he's calling YOU creepy and psycho? Glad you stood up for yourself. These Ascension Enthusiasts, my God, Descension is more like it.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|