Later tonight, In Search Of will air its season finale, a two-hour search for the lost city of Atlantis. I am not overly enthusiastic about their hunt, and I can’t imagine how it is going to differ from all of the other two-hour Atlantis specials that have aired over the past five years. But in preparation for this, I thought it would be worth briefly mentioning a claim about Atlantis that has been cycling around the internet. A YouTube video claiming that Atlantis is located in Mauritania received a big push over the past two weeks after Russian propaganda site Sputnik picked it up, along with the online British tabloids that follow Sputnik’s lead with clockwork regularity. From there, the story spread to prominent “mystery” sites like Mysterious Universe as it continued its upward ascent to the mainstream The video claims that that Richat Structure, or the Eye of the Sahara, is an eroded set of concentric rings in Mauritania about 40 km in diameter that geologists have concluded is a natural structure, probably a collapsed magma dome. This, of course, does not preclude it from being Atlantis, but a number of facts mitigate against it:
The video also makes a number of errors. For example, it alleges that the structure was first seen in the 1960s, but it had been described as early as the 1930s and was investigated in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s. The speaker also uses a measurement of 607 American feet for a Greek stadion, despite the length of a stadion varying wildly across the Greek world. This makes it difficult to develop precise modern measurements from imprecise units. The speaker claims that the proof that Atlantis was in the Sahara is to be found in Plato’s claims that “Atlantis is part of the Atlantic which is no longer accessible by ship.” He mistranslates a line that is better rendered as “This power [i.e., Atlantis] came forth out of the Atlantic Ocean, for in those days the Atlantic was navigable.” As we shall see, this mistake is important for his argument. Similarly, he offers another passage from a few lines later that he misuses. He says, “Atlantis, when sunk by the earthquake, became an impassible barrier of mud to voyagers sailing from hence to any part of the ocean.” This is more typically rendered as “But afterwards there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune all your warlike men in a body sank into the earth, and the island of Atlantis in like manner disappeared in the depths of the sea. For which reason the sea in those parts is impassable and impenetrable, because there is a shoal of mud in the way; and this was caused by the subsidence of the island.” He says this means Atlantis became “landlocked,” but he misses the fact that Plato envisioned Atlantis as being a muddy blockage stopping ships from sailing around it, not that Atlantis dried up a chunk of the sea and became mired in a desert. That’s literally the opposite of what Plato said and meant, as noted by the fact that Plato specifies that Atlantis disappeared underwater in the same sentence that the speaker cites but does not quote. Funny thing that In Search Of had asked me to appear on their show and fly out to West Africa to hunt for the lost continent. How is it that the same claim pops up all over the place at almost the same time?
36 Comments
E.P. Grondine
9/14/2018 08:37:23 am
"Funny thing that In Search Of had asked me to appear on their show and fly out to West Africa to hunt for the lost continent."
Reply
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/14/2018 01:40:27 pm
Or a collapsed magma dome. Plagiarized from Wikipedia:
Reply
E.P. Grondine
9/14/2018 03:35:31 pm
Hi Dan -
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/14/2018 04:31:17 pm
You really do hear hooves and think of zebras don't you? Seismic activity can change a lot over 100 million years and 3 out of the 4 sites in the region have been adjudged impact sites, JUST NOT THIS ONE. It's just a horse.
E.P. Grondine
9/15/2018 12:57:04 am
HI Dan -
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/15/2018 01:30:43 pm
See above for the reasons the Richat Structure is NOT "impact geology." Is your Indian name "Dog with Bone"?
Hugh’s poo
9/14/2018 08:58:38 am
Unnnhhh! Eye jus squeezed out a multi-ringed megalithic city on the ground. Sure, Jason was asked to be on the show.... but he was too busy squeezing out regular piles of envy and hate here. All the shows he hates ask him to appear. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Reply
Joe Scales
9/14/2018 09:50:30 am
Envy and hate? Dude, you're the one crapping all over the place here; and fiber is not your motivation.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
9/14/2018 03:45:47 pm
Hi Poo -
Reply
Joe Scales
9/14/2018 09:47:53 am
"Funny thing that In Search Of had asked me to appear on their show and fly out to West Africa to hunt for the lost continent."
Reply
E.P. Grondine
9/14/2018 03:39:19 pm
Hi Joe -
Reply
Hugh’s poo
9/14/2018 07:29:31 pm
Oh Joe. Jason is too busy squeezing out his stinking piles of hate and bias to take any time conducting real research. He needs to be close to his toilet.
Reply
E.P. Grondine
9/15/2018 01:09:41 am
Poo, you are mistaking Jason's irritation at the commercialization of stupidity with some kind of bias.
Astonishing Manipulation
9/14/2018 03:48:04 pm
You just made astonishing manipulation. This is amazing because you are so called debunker, yet it's another time when you spread false information. You said 'A YouTube video received a big push over the past two weeks after Russian propaganda site Sputnik picked it up, along with the online British tabloids that follow Sputnik’s lead with clockwork regularity. From there, the story spread to prominent “mystery” sites like Mysterious Universe as it continued its upward ascent to the mainstream'.
Reply
9/14/2018 03:59:13 pm
Popularity on YouTube isn't the same as popularity in the mainstream media. Lots of YouTube videos rack up massive hits but never get discussed in newspapers or magazines. My point was that the video inspired a lot of coverage in the tabloid media, and in case you weren't aware, newspapers and magazines collectively still have tens of millions more readers than the 500,000 who watched the YouTube video. 500,000 is such a small number by TV standards that it doesn't even approach the number watching the 1 AM showing of SportsCenter.
Reply
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/14/2018 04:55:50 pm
Yall need to git right witchu terniminology and you numberology. According to Youtube's numbers, the CHANNEL has 560,660 SUBSCRIBERS and the VIDEO in question had 1,500,000 VIEWS over the past week.
Seed of Bismuth
9/14/2018 04:59:20 pm
You reply to this person but don't delete linguistical poo-slinger, why?
Joe Scales
9/14/2018 04:20:42 pm
His Russian dog whistle ain't for Laika...
Reply
9/14/2018 04:44:04 pm
It's hardly political to note that Sputnik ran a story about the video, or that the UK tabloids often repackage Sputnik UFO / alien / ancient mystery stories for their readers. Dates and times of publication show the pattern.
It is so funny:
Reply
Joe Scales
9/14/2018 09:36:44 pm
"Making money with books is out of fashion?"
Reply
Machala
9/14/2018 10:21:02 pm
More likely, on one of Faux News' "fair and balanced news" programs, like Fox & Friends or Hannity !
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/14/2018 10:31:45 pm
This reminds me of some Dreams From My Father which pulled a Veil over some Hard Choices I had to make, which of course were a source of Fear. But then I made a Radical move and devoted myself to Lucifer.
Hugh’s poo
9/14/2018 10:44:43 pm
Pfffttttt! Phew.
Joe Scales
9/15/2018 11:04:32 am
Machala,
Robert Burke
9/14/2018 11:04:49 pm
The Eye of Mauritania is a plasma strike - a very big one. There are other smaller ones litered across Northern Africa. Look where the winds were forced around it like the Eye.
Reply
Semi-intelligent Atlantis searchers would now argue in the following way:
Reply
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/15/2018 05:09:15 pm
In English we just say "Atlantis searchers".
Reply
@Americancool"Disco"Dan
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/16/2018 02:08:12 pm
I would think that you, being the Hun, would be in favor of eliminating redundancy.
Bill Birkeland
9/16/2018 09:50:49 pm
It is getting the point that just about every circular, semi-circular, or arcurate and many not so circular features, havd been argued to be an extraterrestrial impact (Reimold 2007). Similarly, it seems that just as there is a impact crater bandwagon, there seems to be an "I found Atlantis" bandwagon in which just about every large or semi-large circular, semi-circular, or arcurate and many not so circular feature visible in Google Earth, digital elevation models, or many other remote sensing databases has been proposed to be the site of Atlantis. [Eventually, it will get to the point that it list of areas not considered to be the site of Atlantis will be smaller than the list of sites proposed to be the location of Atlantis. :-) :-) ] Obviously, such situation does not encourage an outsider to have any trust that a specific "Atlantis du jour" is based upon scientific rigor instead of wishful thinking. It would help their crediability if the proponents of a specific place being atlantis would review what has been published about it before composing their arguments and made sure they had their facts right, which they often show no sign of having done either.
Reply
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/16/2018 10:53:29 pm
"It would help their crediability if the proponents of a specific place being atlantis would review what has been published about it before composing their arguments and made sure they had their facts right, which they often show no sign of having done either."
Reply
Theo Paijmans
9/18/2018 05:48:16 pm
So what's new? Already in 1904 German ethnologist and archaeologist Leo Frobenius proposed the Atlantis in Africa idea. As wikipedia summarizes his racist theory:
Reply
Artos
9/19/2018 05:11:22 am
I have a feeling you are just trying to discredit the claim without giving it a fair chance, in the past people believed the city of Troy was a myth until it was found in Turkey and cases like that have happened in our history mostly because people refuse to believe in the different possibilities.
Reply
AmericanCool"Disco"Dan
9/19/2018 06:49:26 am
"I have never seen" is perhaps not the best possible argument. In fact I have never seen an argument that sucks more unwashed hobo ass than "I have never seen".
Reply
Finn
9/21/2018 02:26:10 am
"The best way to prove if the anomaly is Atlantis, a geological formation, meteorite impact etc would be to fully excavate the area for definite evidence."
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
January 2025
|