Back in season three, Ancient Aliens devoted an hour to “Aliens and the Undead” (S03E14), which covered zombies, vampires, and so on. Just last week, they gave a good portion of “Secrets of the Mummies” (S07E10) to the idea that the ancient people believed in the resurrection of the flesh. The producers, however, seem to think that their viewers don’t remember any of this and repackage some of the same material as S07E11 “Alien Resurrections,” right down to the claims about entering quantum heaven after death with immortal angel-aliens. Segment 1 We open in Phoenix, Arizona, in 1991 to review singer-songwriter Pam Reynolds’s aneurysm. Doctors cooled her body and stopped her circulation and brain activity before bringing her back to life. Reynolds then reported having a near death experience where she met angels and her relatives. The narrator wonders whether this proves that the “immortal soul” exists independently of the body. Research by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff is used to suggest that consciousness is a quantum state that exists independent of body itself. Physicists reject this idea, and there is no evidence in favor of the suggestion. But no matter—Jonathan Young of the Joseph Campbell Archives notes that near death experiences are similar across cultures. Rather than following the ideas of David Lewis-Williams that these experiences arise from the similar architecture of the human brain operating in altered states of consciousness, the show instead suggests that near death experiences are the same as the tractor beams that haul abductees aboard UFOs. According to William Henry, UFOs and heaven are the same thing, and accessible through our brains. So we go to Israel around the ninth century BCE to talk about the prophet Elijah who in 1 Kings 17:21-22 brings back a dead boy by praying and laying atop him three times: And he stretched himself upon the child three times, and cried unto the Lord, and said, O Lord my God, I pray thee, let this child's soul come into him again. And the Lord heard the voice of Elijah; and the soul of the child came into him again, and he revived. Henry tells us that dying and rising gods like Quetzalcoatl and Krishna represent efforts to teach humans how to cross into the UFO-Heaven realm of light.
Segment 2 This segment opens with a science experiment to test the resurrection potential of microscopic creatures called tardigrades that become completely dehydrated and inert in extreme conditions and can be revived with water. The show likens this to the mummification process for dead human bodies and goes back to the well from last week’s episode about the resurrection of mummified corpses. We review the Egyptian afterlife for the second time in two weeks, and most of this material is very similar to the “Aliens and the Undead” treatment of the same topic back in season three. William Henry falsely claims that the god Ptah was an alien from Sirius who taught the “technology” of resurrection. Sirius was the star of Isis, not Ptah. Oddly, in this version of the resurrection claim, the show reverses course on the earlier episodes and instead argues that resurrection is spiritual rather than physical, and that the soul instead is a piece of “technology” (in Henry’s words) that is beamed into the sky after death. Ah, but the narrator seems to have anticipated my objection! He briefly notes that “ancient astronaut theorists” also believe that the Egyptians anticipated a bodily resurrection. Thus are the opposites reconciled simply by declaring two contradictory ideas true. If your soul is off on Sirius with Ptah, how can it also be reanimating your desiccated corpse? Does it come back, like the Christian and Islamic souls that will return to the flesh at the Last Judgment but otherwise pass the time in heaven? Segment 3 For some reason we are discussing efforts to Christianize the Congo in the late 1400s and early 1500s. The Congolese apparently believed at the time that humans have two souls, one which bequeaths personality and the other that animates the flesh. Missionaries report (almost certainly exaggerated) stories that the Congolese “witch doctors”* (the show’s term) use the lesser soul to create zombies from the newly dead. The narrator suggests that the existence of zombies proves that the “witch doctors” and Egyptians are right that the soul exists and has two parts which can be manipulated through powers given to Africans by the sky gods, called orishas, who are aliens. Giorgio Tsoukalos takes the tall headdresses and hairstyles of African art as evidence of “elongated skulls” among the aliens. William Henry tells us that the myth of zombies originate with aliens. Having Erich von Däniken on to talk about Africans mistaking alien doctors for divine supermen is uncomfortable since von Däniken is on record in Signs of the Gods as asking racist questions about Africans: “Was the black race a failure and did the extraterrestrials change the genetic code by gene surgery and then programme a white or a yellow race?” (* Note: I originally indicated that witch doctor is a pejorative, but as the comments below show, the term is still used as a technical descriptor of certain types of medicine men, distinct from its pejorative connotation when used to describe quacks.) Segment 4 This segment takes the opposite tack from the last. We looked at the resurrection of the body without the soul (though without even making an effort at proof), so this time we’re going to look at reincarnation as the resurrection of the soul without the body. David Wilcock believes that reincarnated people have birth marks that graphically depict their death in their previous lives. No examples are given. But if the Hindus are right, as the show suggests, each person would have died hundreds of times and should be completely covered in birthmarks. How does the soul decide which deaths to commemorate with scarring? The show discusses various world reincarnation beliefs and then suggests that there are quasi-magical spirit beings who are also aliens and, something like the resurrection technology from To Your Scattered Bodies Go, have mastered reincarnation to the point that they simply ignore death as they hop from one body to the next, functionally immortal. Would this not also make them functionally gods and therefore make the alien part of the equation functionally irrelevant? And why do they come to the earth to spend all their time training us (badly) to follow in their footsteps? I guess that is the kind of logic only an immortal alien god understands. Segment 5 Oh! We’re going to get a little controversial now. In this segment, the show finally brings Jesus into the ancient alien fold. The ufologist Christian preacher Barry H. Downing (from Syracuse, NY, near my hometown, no less) suggests that Jesus’ vision of Moses and Elijah in Matthew 17:3 was a UFO encounter. The Resurrection is now declared to be an extraterrestrial event on the strength of the glowing angel from Matthew 28:3. They don’t quite go far enough to say Jesus was himself an alien, only that his resurrection was attended by aliens. All of these claims are lifted, sometimes nearly verbatim, from a 1977 ancient astronaut article I wrote about back in August, right around the time they would have planned and shot this segment. After this, the show recognizes that the Catholic Eucharist asserts that the bread and wine literally become the flesh and blood of Jesus, and in a kind of icky way suggests that Jesus is “resurrected” at the Eucharist, either physically or metaphysically. The various pundits offer thoughtless reflections on the Eucharist that are fairly close to actual Catholic dogma about entering into spiritual communion with Jesus and becoming of one body with him through the Eucharist, only they want to swap out the divine for a metaphysical and/or quantum alien cannibalism that, like the belief of cannibals everywhere, allows us to absorb the power of the victim. But: Jesus is an alien! An alien who can possess bread. Since ancient astronaut theorists do not believe in just one alien the way Catholics consider Jesus unique, does this mean that every food has aliens possessing it? What does that mean for the Flying Spaghetti Monster? Is my dinner safe? Segment 6 Here the show goes all Jurassic Park and repeats material from last week about whether mummies can have their DNA restored so the bodies and souls can be brought back to life. (Souls, of course, are drawn to DNA matches like magnets—or something like that.) The show takes this a step further and claims that the Last Judgment is a technological achievement through which all bodies are resurrected in a shocking genetic engineering and/or cloning event that somehow also involves movement into and out of a spiritual dimension populated by aliens, who are not actual flesh and blood creatures but rather immaterial floating souls. This shit doesn’t make any sense, but it has a vaguely spiritual message that points toward a New Age purpose behind the ancient astronaut theory, and which motivates it. Seriously, though: Aliens (a) are immortal, (b) are immaterial, (c) control our souls, and (d) nevertheless are forced to inhabit bread at our command. This was one wacky episode that managed to have something to insult skeptics and Christians alike!
55 Comments
EP
12/5/2014 02:59:07 pm
Jason, I think you're being unfair to AA (though, given their and von Daniken's records, I can't really blame you). You ask:
Reply
Jeremy J Leveque
12/5/2014 06:35:12 pm
It's a specifically colonialist term, meant to portray African religions as devil-worship and sorcery. Therefore, evil and uncivilized. It's pretty racist.
Reply
EP
12/6/2014 02:16:01 am
That is false. "Witch doctor" is a technical term that is still widely used by anthropologists and other scholars to refer to practitioners of various traditions all over the world. Ditto for "shaman". You may argue that it's racist to mischaracterize a shaman as a witch doctor (or vice versa), but that's not to say that the term itself is racist.
EP
12/6/2014 02:16:11 am
That is false. "Witch doctor" is a technical term that is still widely used by anthropologists and other scholars to refer to practitioners of various traditions all over the world. Ditto for "shaman". You may argue that it's racist to mischaracterize a shaman as a witch doctor (or vice versa), but that's not to say that the term itself is racist.
EP
12/6/2014 02:25:41 am
Sorry about the double post...
spookyparadigm
12/6/2014 10:03:22 am
" "Witch doctor" is a technical term that is still widely used by anthropologists"
spookyparadigm
12/6/2014 10:04:38 am
I see your post below. First time I've ever seen anyone use that term in academic writing since WWII.
EP
12/6/2014 10:17:20 am
Other than the names already mentioned, Michael J. Winkelman (do you know him, by any chance?). Winkelman not only uses it (though with caveats about terminological confusion), Irwin Press, from whom Winkelman gets the term "the witch-doctor's legacy", etc., etc.
EP
12/6/2014 10:20:27 am
Also, Michael Gelfand literally wrote a book under the title "Witch Doctor". Not the most recent bit of work, but definitely way after WWII.
spookyparadigm
12/6/2014 11:30:27 am
Given how much even the term shamanism has to be qualified unless one is talking about Siberia, I am honestly surprised by the even vaguely recent use of witch doctor in a non critical fashion (though not the Ember and Ember use so much).
EP
12/6/2014 11:36:38 am
Could you give some examples of where it is qualified? I'm especially interested in cases that aren't just concern about misapplication.
spookyparadigm
12/6/2014 12:13:50 pm
I've seen a number that raise the objections of
spookyparadigm
12/6/2014 12:20:01 pm
More qualification of the same sort here
EP
12/6/2014 12:38:06 pm
I agree completely. Used as off-the-cuff catchalls, these terms are bound to lead to inaccuracies, downright incongruities, and even give offense. Like using "Kabbalah" in the sense of something like "black magic". But that doesn't make these terms intrinsically offensive, any more than "Kabbalah" is intrinsically offensive.
EP
12/6/2014 06:32:21 am
In case anyone thinks I don't know what I'm talking about:
Reply
12/6/2014 07:02:13 am
That's interesting since in "Death and After-life Rituals" (2011) Canisius Mwandayi says that the term witch doctor is offensive and Richard J. Gehman in "African Traditional Religion in Biblical Perspective" (1989) says that the term has "negative connotations," is pejorative, and is not favored for most uses. It seems there are two very different views on the term "witch doctor." I've always heard it used in the pejorative, associated with colonialist narratives about primitive savagery.
EP
12/6/2014 07:17:32 am
It is often used in a manner that is bound to be offensive. In the same way in which it is offensive to use "Talmudism" to mean "obscurantism", for example. OED lists a slang use that is offensive in this way. However, the primary meaning is neutral. Indeed, it is a term used to describe someone who does good work, as opposed to working evil magic.
Another problem with the term "Witch Doctor" is the way it has been portrayed in popular media. In movies and comic books (particularly during the 1930's&40's), they were often portrayed as over blown and over dramatized hucksters or boogeymen preying on the simple and naive peoples of their tribes. This would then be contrasted to the wise and civilized missionary, medical doctor, or white explorer (this could include one or more types depending on the script)who was better educated and not intimidated superstitions of any kind.
EP
12/6/2014 09:27:45 am
PaulN, you are confusing two things: the term itself being offensive (because it's pejorative) and offensive portrayal of the people .
EP
12/6/2014 09:28:48 am
Sorry, first sentence of the above post should read:
@EP
EP
12/6/2014 05:27:48 pm
I don't get it. You said nothing about "serious professional view" in your original comment. Besides, none of this changes the fact that the term itself is not offensive, contrary to what Jason said.
@EP
EP
12/7/2014 04:31:47 pm
Would your reasoning apply in equal measure to communists? And where would it leave the term "communist"?
@ EP
EP
12/8/2014 09:43:14 am
What you're suggesting sounds kinda ad hoc, I'm afraid. Also, plenty of people associate a "fringe" meaning with 'communist' as well. Some of them even put up anti-Obama billboards. :)
It may seem ad hoc to you, but that's more than likely due to the passage of time. If you had lived during that period you might understand (think of trying to explain current events to somebody who was born 10 years after the events occurred).
EP
12/9/2014 09:00:33 am
No, I meant your reasoning sounds ad hoc... In any case, it's not a big deal. We don't need to bicker about it.
Uncle Ron
12/6/2014 02:35:10 pm
To quote the famous anthropologist David Seville, "Ooo eee ooo-ah-ah, ting tang, walla-walla-bing-bang".
Reply
12/5/2014 10:36:36 pm
Part of one sentence got pasted in twice. I've fixed it.
Reply
Only Me
12/5/2014 04:06:59 pm
They finally crossed the threshold, jumped the shark, etc. It must have been decided that after seven years of this garbage, it was safe to do so.
Reply
Shane Sullivan
12/6/2014 03:59:13 am
Stay way from Devil's Food!
Reply
Shane Sullivan
12/6/2014 04:21:38 am
Sorry, stay *away* from Devil's Food.
spookyparadigm
12/5/2014 05:36:06 pm
So, John Lear.
Reply
EP
12/7/2014 04:25:02 am
What about him? :)
Reply
DTG
12/5/2014 06:31:57 pm
"Aliens (a) are immortal, (b) are immaterial, (c) control our souls, and (d) nevertheless are forced to inhabit bread at our command."
Reply
Shane Sullivan
12/6/2014 04:19:44 am
Rats. When I read the title, I was hoping to see Winona Rider and Sigourney Weaver battling space monsters.
Reply
Jean Stone
12/6/2014 08:02:32 am
Yes, but even the most basic level of research beyond 'here's a concept I read about third-hand' seems beyond them most of the time so no surprise there. Of course, if your starting point is that any given figure is an alien, or any given tradition was inspired by aliens, research would spoil the party.
Reply
Not the Comte de Saint Germain
12/6/2014 08:39:00 am
Insert Close Encounters mashed-potato joke here.
Shane Sullivan
12/6/2014 11:19:26 am
There's gotta be some reason E.T. was so interested in those Reese's Pieces, not to mention ALF and his predatory fixation on cats.
EP
12/6/2014 11:24:04 am
And the aliens in District 9 were obsessed with cat food. Coincidence?
Shane Sullivan
12/6/2014 11:42:50 am
*Gasp* You're right!
EP
12/6/2014 12:07:53 pm
The whole cast of that show is aliens. Like, the whole show makes a lot more sense if you watch it with the assumption that what's happening is something like 3rd Rock from the Sun.
Shane Sullivan
12/6/2014 05:17:13 pm
I think of it as the cast of a cartoon trying to get by in the real world- as opposed to something like Community, which is just a live-action cartoon.
FrankenNewYork
12/6/2014 11:15:00 am
Wouldn't it be more entertaining to write: Giorgio Tsoukalos takes the tall headdresses and hairstyles of African art as justification for his own strangely hypnotic doo.
Reply
steve in SoDak
12/6/2014 12:30:04 pm
"The producers, however, seem to think that their viewers don’t remember any of this and repackage some of the same material"
Reply
diggz
12/6/2014 01:14:10 pm
This show is literally turning into its own memes.
Reply
Only Me
12/6/2014 01:40:24 pm
Hey, Giorgio Tsoukalos is already a meme!
Reply
Jase
12/7/2014 05:45:18 am
Hi - I normally come to this website as part of my own researches into the differing subject matter areas. I find Mr Colvaito's annotations of the episodes a great resource as well as my own notes through each show.
Reply
EP
12/7/2014 06:04:50 am
"Before jumping on the left-wing Cultural Marxist view that all the mass media is doing nowadays"
Reply
12/7/2014 06:25:58 am
Your point is well taken, Jase, and it's interesting how the connotations of the term vary so greatly. I think it's probably due to the slang use of "witch doctor" as a pejorative, which frankly is the only way I've encountered it in recent literature. I'll edit the above to reflect the consensus view.
Reply
CHF01
12/8/2014 12:33:14 pm
Well, I guess I'll be the lone guy in the crowed in stating that I thought parts of this episode were thought provoking. The subject of life after death is intriguing and touches close to home for me. My grandfather survived a head on collision with a semi-truck when he was younger. He died, the sheet was being pulled over his lifeless body and he resurrected.
Reply
Sector85
12/9/2014 10:00:41 am
"For some reason we are discussing efforts to Christianize the Congo in the late 1400s and early 1500s."
Reply
EP
12/9/2014 10:10:39 am
Actually, the Kingdom of Kongo was already being Christianized by the Portugese in the late 1400s. It rapidly became Catholic.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an author and researcher focusing on pop culture, science, and history. Bylines: New Republic, Esquire, Slate, etc. There's more about me in the About Jason tab. Newsletters
Enter your email below to subscribe to my newsletter for updates on my latest projects, blog posts, and activities, and subscribe to Culture & Curiosities, my Substack newsletter.
Categories
All
Terms & ConditionsPlease read all applicable terms and conditions before posting a comment on this blog. Posting a comment constitutes your agreement to abide by the terms and conditions linked herein.
Archives
September 2024
|